Both had FC careers starting in 1985/6 and ending in 2005, both averaged 29 in Test cricket, both captained their country at various points, yet Khan played twice as many tests as Latif.
Cricinfo suggests that Latif was the better 'keeper, but was a more difficult character to rein in, whereas Khan was a slightly better batsman and more of a combative player.
Both look to be relatively equal, so is there any reason why there is such a selection disparity? Am I missing something, or can it be chalked up to 1990s Pakistan selection problems?
So basically, who was better?
Cricinfo suggests that Latif was the better 'keeper, but was a more difficult character to rein in, whereas Khan was a slightly better batsman and more of a combative player.
Both look to be relatively equal, so is there any reason why there is such a selection disparity? Am I missing something, or can it be chalked up to 1990s Pakistan selection problems?
So basically, who was better?