Oh. That makes more sense.No; I posted that after he got out.
At the same time, there's no need to take unnecessary risks. Don't mind us being behind at close if we have two of the batsmen still out thereEngland are just way too cautious against the spin. Going nowhere.
If Strauss had been a bit more positive there wouldn't have been a short leg in place. This defensive mindset just encourages the spinners and plays into Pakistan's hands.At the same time, there's no need to take unnecessary risks. Don't mind us being behind at close if we have two of the batsmen still out there
Indeed. The England top order seem petrified of using their feet, for example.I'm becoming increasingly convinced that the more you let spinners just bowl, without forcing them to think about their lines/lengths/field placings, your chances of getting out to them go up massively.
try a sweep Cookie.
Hahatry a sweep Cookie.
CorrectedI'm becoming increasingly convinced that the more you letspinnersbowlers just bowl, without forcing them to think about their lines/lengths/field placings, your chances of getting out to them go up massively.
I do think there's a very good case to be made for stonewalling against quick bowlers in some circumstances. But spinners... not so much.Corrected
They're not alone tbf, and this is a more general "modern batsman" gripe.Indeed. The England top order seem petrified of using their feet, for example.