wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Only has two stages IMO -
1. Good bowler who could bat a bit
2. Being ****
1. Good bowler who could bat a bit
2. Being ****
He was always Sinclair-like when he came out to bat. Everyone knew he had potential and it was like come on Franklin score some runs this time. Hits it in the air to Ponting*Well he actually started out as #4 in youth cricket; his batting was always rated higher.
For what it's worth, I totally agree. It ****s me as well. To people who really follow our domestic game and know what they're talking about, he's been on the radar for quite some time. So really they're outing themselves as clueless.btw, it ****s me off when sections of the media claims Wells is unknown. Maybe to you lot, but to radio commentators and listeners he's known.
Even if we go by the logic of "but no one cares about domestic cricket so he's unknown" then that means everyone in domestic cricket is unknown, making the term a tad redundant.
They will be nervous, though I can't see them dropping one of our four pacemen for Wells at this point. However if either Southee or Boult give the selectors an excuse by bowling poorly, do agree Wells could come in as fourth seamer perhaps second SA test.Given the lack of dibbly dobbly bowlers in our batting line-up at present, I wouldn't be shocked if Wells actually plays on Thursday. I suspect the selectors are very nervous about exposing a lower order of Vettori at 6, unproven keeper, and four bowlers (including Martin) to the South Africans later in the summer. Bracewell and Southee have potential, to be good enough to contribute at 8 or 9, but at present they are both one place too high.
Indeed.Big pressure on the top 4 to actually score some ****ing centuries.
Meth needs to learn to avoid the ball, methinks.Cricinfo said:Shingi Masakadza is line to make his debut, taking the third seamer's spot after Meth was struck with a ball during training and is on crutches. Legspinner Graeme Cremer will also play after veteran Ray Price was ruled out with a groin injury.
I'm marginally skeptical about Watling's glove-work as well, but was interested to learn he was first selected at FC level as a wicket-keeper. Happy to reserve judgement until I actually see him keep in a Test though, as should you.Just not sold at all on the Watling selection. He is not a natural keeper so it just ****s me that once again we are trying to make a wicketkeeper out of a batsmen and whilst one of the openers is a natural keeper. Yes, I know McCullum will never keep in tests again but it just looks ridiculous.
Stretch too far for almost any keeper in the history of game, itbt.It's most likely a stretch too far for an inexperienced keeper to open and keep in tests. Wright has only ever said the keeper he selected would fill the number 7 slot.
Yeah, it's not even so much about the amount of runs he would score because lets be honest Martin Guptill scores sweet **** all runs anyway. It's what effect the extra fatigue has on his keeping.Stretch too far for almost any keeper in the history of game, itbt.
Could only expect him to average early 30s at most if you expect him to back up straight after keeping.
I don't expect him (or Guptill for that matter) to average any more than that anyway tbh.Stretch too far for almost any keeper in the history of game, itbt.
Could only expect him to average early 30s at most if you expect him to back up straight after keeping.
47?i hope we bat first and put up an australian-like total.