-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** India in Australia 2011/12
- Thread starter Spark
- Start date
Flem274*
123/5
Warner-meh
Cowan-some number
Marsh-meh
Ponting-10
Clarke-15
Hussey-10
Haddin-go away
Siddle-heart
Patto-5
Lyon-didnt really do anything
Hilf-8
Gambhir-5
Sehwag-lulz
Dravid-
Tendulkar-not 100
Laxman-5
Kohli- -10
Dhoni- -10
Ashwin-5 for his hilarious tail end heroics
yeah I'm bored now.
Cowan-some number
Marsh-meh
Ponting-10
Clarke-15
Hussey-10
Haddin-go away
Siddle-heart
Patto-5
Lyon-didnt really do anything
Hilf-8
Gambhir-5
Sehwag-lulz
Dravid-
Tendulkar-not 100
Laxman-5
Kohli- -10
Dhoni- -10
Ashwin-5 for his hilarious tail end heroics
yeah I'm bored now.
Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ashwin scored more runs than Sehwag, Dravid and Kohli
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
The latter three might've taken a wicket if they were allowed to bowl 45 overs or whatever though.
Ruckus
International Captain
You must be dying a little inside for giving Gambhir 5.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
morgieb
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sehwag went close tbh.The latter three might've taken a wicket if they were allowed to bowl 45 overs or whatever though.
Spark
Global Moderator
Haigh <3
smash84
The Tiger King
I think Zaheer deserves more than Gambhir and Laxman.
rating Gambhir over Zaheer is definitely a case of Gambhiring
KungFu_Kallis
State Captain
Ok next question.. in view of the halfway point of the series.
Would you now bring back Watson if passed fit to bat, assuming at this stage he can bowl a few overs part time i.e. not fully fit with bowling yet. And if so, who would he replace? For those inclined to think it's obviously Cowan, I have 2 observations:
1. Are you sure you want 2 dashers at the top of the order when one of them is just returning and has been in shaky form with the bat for the past 12 months? Are we ready to ditch grafter Cowan already after 1 solid game and 1 not so solid?
2. If Watson is ultimately going to returning to bowling lots of overs (averaging mid 20's in the last 12-24 months iirc), and play as an allrounder, is the plan to move him down the order for him to be able to sustain this (by his own admission he's been struggling to open the batting straight after bowling)?
3. Following on from number 2, if he's going to move down the order later, why not slot him into the middle order now if anywhere.. but again... who would you drop?
Or is the guy just bang out of luck and really can't slot back into the team right now?
Would you now bring back Watson if passed fit to bat, assuming at this stage he can bowl a few overs part time i.e. not fully fit with bowling yet. And if so, who would he replace? For those inclined to think it's obviously Cowan, I have 2 observations:
1. Are you sure you want 2 dashers at the top of the order when one of them is just returning and has been in shaky form with the bat for the past 12 months? Are we ready to ditch grafter Cowan already after 1 solid game and 1 not so solid?
2. If Watson is ultimately going to returning to bowling lots of overs (averaging mid 20's in the last 12-24 months iirc), and play as an allrounder, is the plan to move him down the order for him to be able to sustain this (by his own admission he's been struggling to open the batting straight after bowling)?
3. Following on from number 2, if he's going to move down the order later, why not slot him into the middle order now if anywhere.. but again... who would you drop?
Or is the guy just bang out of luck and really can't slot back into the team right now?
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Watson probably won't be back at any point in this series, but there's no way in hell that he'll be left out when he is properly fit, and nor should he be. Australia's most valuable cricketer bar now who probably, on figures anyway, actually commands a place on both batting and bowling alone right now.
As for where he bats; personally I'd have him at 3.