ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Never saw him struggling. It's a rumour. It's a conspiracy. To make us complacent.Ponting looking really good. Still won't score a 100 but good to see him not struggling while at the crease.
Never saw him struggling. It's a rumour. It's a conspiracy. To make us complacent.Ponting looking really good. Still won't score a 100 but good to see him not struggling while at the crease.
Marsh was just getting his average back into the mid 30s where he feels most comfortable.And something which Shaun Marsh doesn't look like doing again any time soon.
I was stating the facts and commenting on India's form against England, WI and Aus, so i'd argue that it does belong here actually, but as usual any use of the word "WI" and people start jumping up and down like toddlers ,Regardless, it still doesn't ****ING belong here.
Yeah sure mate..... but when Ponting was Marsh' age he was already a world beater and when he was batting at 3 if nothing else he certainly made sure that the middle order didn't get exposed too early.Ponting was pushed down to 4 because Shaun Marsh did something at 3 that Ricky Ponting hadn't done in a long time
EDIT: Btw Ponting and Clarke's demotion in the batting order has everything to do with their inability to deal with the new cherry in recent times and had Marsh scored that century or not the slide down the order was more or less inevitable.
When do the Windies next play a series against a neutral country, so I can post in that thread about how they'll be **** against Australia?I was stating the facts and commenting on India's form against England, WI and Aus, so i'd argue that it does belong here actually, but as usual any use of the word "WI" and people start jumping up and down like toddlers ,
Anyway lets get back on topic now, if Aus get anything above 260 it's over imo.
.BRING BACK HUGHES z