• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Australia 2011/12

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Expecting them to go full ****** on Boxing Day and name Siddle and Hilfenhaus for their experience, and Starc as the third seamer for his left-arm variation.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Speaking of which, the mighty Steve Smith is making his captaincy debut tonight #FutureCaptain #BetterThanPaine
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Surely the thinking is easy enough to see mate?

They're unsure what the best make up of the team is. Clearly India's batting is their strength, so they are trying to cover their bases in the case that they get going and have to bowl for a long period.

They have two options: Go with Marsh in the all out hope that he's 100% fit and he makes alot of runs, OR;

They go with DC because they think they will need that extra bowler, which is the trade off of him probably not making as many runs as a specialist bat.

It's not a like-for-like replacement. If it was, they'd have Usman in the squad as cover for Marsh.
Yeah, I can't believe it's that hard for people to follow.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
From an article in today's Herald Sun, by James Pandaram.

"Should Hilfenhaus be selected in the Australian XI at the expense of Starc on Monday, the hosts would be without a left-arm bowling option, save for the occasional finger spin of captain Michael Clarke."

Who gives a flying duck?
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
From an article in today's Herald Sun, by James Pandaram.

"Should Hilfenhaus be selected in the Australian XI at the expense of Starc on Monday, the hosts would be without a left-arm bowling option, save for the occasional finger spin of captain Michael Clarke."

Who gives a flying duck?
Well tbf it was thought of as a legit concern to play two lefties when Mitch and Dougeh were about.

Stupd logic though, isn't it?
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hilf bowled l33t for Hobart the other day. Actually bowled full. Haven't seen him play for Tasmania in the shield this year though.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Well tbf it was thought of as a legit concern to play two lefties when Mitch and Dougeh were about.

Stupd logic though, isn't it?
Obviously not having a left armer was a real weakness of the Windies attack in the 80s, and ours in the 1990s and 2000s.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
to get a tiny bit serious:

number of right handed batsmen in the top 7 dismissed this season by Hilf: 6

number of left handed batsmen in the top 7 dismissed this season by Hilf: 6

Number of right handed batsmen in India's top 7: 6


it's just like, Hilf may well be bowling well. He may well be bowling full and getting late swing. But he showed over a very long time in tests he's not very good against right handed batsmen, and he hasn't done much to suggest he's fixed that has he?


So, clearly, we should have picked Josh Lalor.

Obviously not having a left armer was a real weakness of the Windies attack in the 80s, and ours in the 1990s and 2000s.
bloody right arm off spinners, wanting footmarks.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
to get a tiny bit serious:

number of right handed batsmen in the top 7 dismissed this season by Hilf: 6

number of left handed batsmen in the top 7 dismissed this season by Hilf: 6

Number of right handed batsmen in India's top 7: 6


it's just like, Hilf may well be bowling well. He may well be bowling full and getting late swing. But he showed over a very long time in tests he's not very good against right handed batsmen, and he hasn't done much to suggest he's fixed that has he?


So, clearly, we should have picked Josh Lalor
just quietly

Number of right handed batsmen dismissed by Lalor in his FC + tour match career: 9
Number of left handed batsmen dismissed by Lalor in his FC + tour match career: 3

Lalor, of course, also bowls left handed.

#JoshLalor4Aus #MakeItHappen #BetterThanPaine

:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:
 

Ruckus

International Captain
The team looks to be in a pretty poor state at the moment, but it's one of the first times I can say it's laregly not to do with bad decisions, but just the unfortunate occurence of injuries. That being said, I don't give a rats whatever rationale people can come up with for Christian's potential inclusion, it's not a strong enough argument for me at all.

In terms of the overall squad selected though, there isn't really that much more to complain about. I wouldn't have chosen Hilfenhaus (or Starc), but with so many injuries he isn't that far back that the decision is actually a bad one. Without Watson and Harris out though the side looks pretty vunerable.

The bowling attack still looks pretty good, and if Hilfenhaus plays over Starc it will be better than the NZ one imo. But at the same time, Pattinson and Siddle still have to show they can back up their performances from the last series, on what are likely to be much less helpful wickets against far better batsmen.

The batting doesn't instill me with much confidence at all, even in the best case scenario of Marsh playing. Warner looks the goods but he still seems to have a bit of a niggle, and is very inexperienced. Pleased to see Cowan there instead of Khawaja, but it's his debut (on boxing day!) so nerves could well get the best of him. Marsh always has injury concerns. Ponting is still yet to show he even deserves to be in the team. Clarke gets a tick. And Haddin and Hussey aren't in the best of form.

Would definately be putting India as favourites at the moment.
 

Top