Er, the article was posted by The Sean.Trust Ikki to make every discussion about Indian fans somehow and then try and take a moral high ground.
WTF?Yeah, should just stfu and go back to statsguru and hope that PEWS/Howe_zat don't pop into one of his "discussions" imo.
Because you keep going on and on about with your generalizations and then attempt to take the moral high ground for no reason at all.Er, the article was posted by The Sean.
For someone who continuously says to ignore the discussion involving me you have a great habit of joining in.
yeah well- Sehwag scores a run
It's evident that not all Indian fans are the same; I myself point to this all the time. What is the moral high ground here? I didn't understand how this was a moral issue to begin with.Because you keep going on and on about with your generalizations and then attempt to take the moral high ground for no reason at all.
Honestly, no one cares about what you think of a particular nationality of fans either that you have to give your approval or disapproval time and again. Write a book or something titled " Indian Cricket fans on the Web" if you so much want too.
What strawman? No one was talking about youtube commenters, although I am sure some of those people are in that group. The article explains those cricket illiterates which I am talking about, the author was referring to and several people I know in the forum agree with.Ikki, stop constructing straw men and parading them around the thread. This is CW, and no one cares about people who comment on youtube here.
Everyone else, stop biting.
What strawman? No one was talking about youtube commenters, although I am sure some of those people are in that group. The article explains those cricket illiterates which I am talking about, the author was referring to and several people I know in the forum agree with.
Pathetic, really. Don't worry, I'm done.
wow that's interesting. so by that measure he is woefully out of form right now ha.Anyhoo, here's a statlet.
If Tendulkar hasn't got a ton by the end of the Second Test in Australia, it'll have been the most innings he's ever gone without one.
Except that he is getting enough many 90's.wow that's interesting. so by that measure he is woefully out of form right now ha.
That my friend is a scienctifically proven stat right thereimo the 100 centuries makes him better than bradman and that's not just an opinion its a mathematical fact
100 > 99,94
Didn't want to risk any trolling infractions.Don't think anyone picked NZ beating Australia in a test to occur before it.
Haha, that'd be a short book.Write a book or something titled " Indian Cricket fans on the Web" if you so much want too.