Furball
Evil Scotsman
You're not actually that far off the mark; that part of Glasgow is an absolute hole.Bet you weren't thinking that while you were there.
You're not actually that far off the mark; that part of Glasgow is an absolute hole.Bet you weren't thinking that while you were there.
Think DK holds the record going by test matches (48) and that includes spinners. AD is second. Steyn would be level with DK if he takes 6 at the Wanderers but he would have done it is considerably less time.who else is rooting for steyn to get the record next match? 6 more wickets!
edit: and the fast bowlers record for fastest to 250 wickets is donald i think with 89 or 90 innings not sure, so that's up for grabs too!
It would suck if we went from this Newlands beauty to a slab of Gauteng highway. I dare say, after drumming up a good deal of positive vibes from the last test, SA Cricket as a whole needs to follow it up with another one. A 600+ @ 3rpo wicket in not what's needed. A bore draw would massively deflate things.Gauteng has been experiencing a heat wave recently, so the wicket maybe slower and flatter than usual. Doubt it will be as quick as this beaut - 4th Test: South Africa v England at Johannesburg, Jan 14-17, 2010 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/53415-can-dale-steyn-become-fastest-bowler-300-test-wickets.htmlwho else is rooting for steyn to get the record next match? 6 more wickets!
edit: and the fast bowlers record for fastest to 250 wickets is donald i think with 89 or 90 innings not sure, so that's up for grabs too!
Anything will do won't it?Reports here this morning saying Johnson under pressure, but from Cummins, not Copes.
Need to listen to this guy.The key to batting is partnerships, no matter who is scoring. Even if someone is finding it difficult to score and isn't getting runs, it doesn't matter as long as the partnership is building.
But the bowlers only took 2 wickets in the 4th innings, they're obviously the problem.Yeh, drop Johnson. He's the problem.
As has been said many times, Johnson's form is obviously pretty awful right now (despite some recent good showings in FC cricket) but the biggest problems continue to be further up the order. Why are the selectors determined to change absolutely everything and everyone else in the Aussie set-up but the bats? The level of denial about this problem is staggering.
It's unlikely Marsh will be fit anyway.We don't want to drop Ponting so who else could realistically go:
Hughes - nope, made a big series winning hundred the test before
Watson - nope, but maybe down to 6
Ponting - yes/no
Marsh - no
Clarke - no way
Hussey - no
Haddin - yes
This. Can't believe the only change we're looking like making willingly is to the bowling, having been bowled out for 47. Surely that camel's back has been well and truly broken by now.Yeh, drop Johnson. He's the problem.
As has been said many times, Johnson's form is obviously pretty awful right now (despite some recent good showings in FC cricket) but the biggest problems continue to be further up the order. Why are the selectors determined to change absolutely everything and everyone else in the Aussie set-up but the bats? The level of denial about this problem is staggering.