To be fair, he is a better one than all others mentioned in the thread bar Kallis.He's had some success in the ODIs, though not much, which suggests he's not gone completely.. He's obviously in poor form/too old atm but I wouldn't say Bresnan's a better batsmen
Bresnan is better than Tendulkar and Mail, now?To be fair, he is a better one than all others mentioned in the thread bar Kallis.
Sachin and Malinga to denyTo be fair, he is a better one than all others mentioned in the thread bar Kallis.
Sachin not a bowler though.Bresnan is better than Tendulkar and Mail, now?
Still mentioned in this thread.Sachin not a bowler though.
I was going on the quick bowlers as per thread title. Silly choices were ignored.Still mentioned in this thread.
And Mail took 7/16 or something similar in a first grade match a couple of weeks ago. Counts as a bowler now for sure.
yea when there's guys like sameeraweera who avg 54?Crazy to see his average go to 52-53...it was pushing 60 for a long long time there.
Yeah, and future generations won't believe us when we go on about how good he actually was when so many from the same era will average the same or more.yea when there's guys like sameeraweera who avg 54?
and guys like gambhir, cook, bell, smith, kp, younis khan, mahela who avg 50 ....
hope his stubborness doesn't lead to him losing another couple of points..i.e he should retire if things don't improve for him over the next month.
he'd be a forgetton hero if he finished up with a avg of like 50/51
It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.yea when there's guys like sameeraweera who avg 54?
and guys like gambhir, cook, bell, smith, kp, younis khan, mahela who avg 50 ....
hope his stubborness doesn't lead to him losing another couple of points..i.e he should retire if things don't improve for him over the next month.
he'd be a forgotton hero if he finished up with a avg of like 50/51
hahha very true, very true!!It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.
Yeah, Cook may well end up scoring more runs and centuries than Ponting but unless he carries on his last 12 months of ridiculous batting for about another 4 years then he will clearly always be ranked a long way behind Ponting. If he does do it he may bore many non England fans to death in the process.It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.
Yep, I eagerly await the Samaraweera > Ponting thread in 2019.It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.
I think you're missing the point.Yeah, Cook may well end up scoring more runs and centuries than Ponting but unless he carries on his last 12 months of ridiculous batting for about another 4 years then he will clearly always be ranked a long way behind Ponting. If he does do it he may bore many non England fans to death in the process.
Yeah, and future generations won't believe us when we go on about how good he actually was when so many from the same era will average the same or more.
Regardless of what he ends up with, Ponting has been clearly the best batsman of this past decade, and that's something he will always have. Same as Gilchrist - despite ending up with an average below 50 overall, it doesn't really take away from the fact that most of us (or at least the largest minority of us) would have him in our all time XI.It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.
This is so much reminds me of Dravid until recently and the same was said in the threads about him. Sachin turned around his slump quicker and just before the same was about to start.yea when there's guys like sameeraweera who avg 54?
and guys like gambhir, cook, bell, smith, kp, younis khan, mahela who avg 50 ....
hope his stubborness doesn't lead to him losing another couple of points..i.e he should retire if things don't improve for him over the next month.
he'd be a forgotton hero if he finished up with a avg of like 50/51
Has 200 international wickets, tbf.Sachin not a bowler though.
In this comparison, if Ponting is Viv, who is Kallis?It's really good though, cos it means in 20 years time there'll be idiot savant kids on the web saying "Ponting - why do people rate him? Why don't they think Samaraweera or Cook are better?" and the pack of arseholes on here now who say the same thing about Viv will understand how we all feel now.