intcricket
U19 12th Man
Go Watto.
Why don't you wait til after the game and see?So the ICC are okay with greentops like these where teams get bowled out for less than 100 but not dustbowls which do the same. Good stuff.
I didn't turn on my laptop the entire day because I wanted to study. FML.Did you go to the loo at an inopportune moment and miss an innings?
Pretty sure the match needs to be finished before the referees can report it.So the ICC are okay with greentops like these where teams get bowled out for less than 100 but not dustbowls which do the same. Good stuff.
Not sure it would tbh. Especially, if the game goes into tomorrow. ICC tends to favor pitches favoring seamers more for some reason over those that tend to favor spinners early.Your kidding if you think this won't get reported.
As ****ing annoying as that is
Yeah, doing it might have been an attempt to upset the bowler's length, or an attempt 'play his natural game' and launch a counter attack, but when you're 5/18, charging down the wicket on your third ball and attempting to hit over cover is not the smartest move. It doesn't take a genius to understand that.Such a poor understanding of the game of cricket.
In the words of the immortal Shane Warne "If it seams it will spin", Lyon may yet play a part. Copeland would have been difficult though, it must have been a close selection.What a crazy, crazy day of Test cricket. I'm meant to be studying right now but have hardly been able to tear myself away from the TV. Was kind of hoping for them to make the lowest score just so I could say I saw it. As it is, it's definitely the first time I've seen some part of all four innings in one day.
If SA can get through to close just one or two wickets down and come to the game tomorrow with a fresh mind, they've got this in the bag though. How much would Australia kill to have Copeland in the team right now instead of Lyon?
Wasn't a genuine question.I didn't turn on my laptop the entire day because I wanted to study. FML.
44 wickets for 1 since Marsh was out - 44 for 16 before that.
Was between Copeland and Siddle tbf.In the words of the immortal Shane Warne "If it seams it will spin", Lyon may yet play a part. Copeland would have been difficult though, it must have been a close selection.
Oh they will, simply because any game which doesn't go for five days is 'bad for business'.Not sure it would tbh.
Neither should be reported AFAIC.
Clearly it must, because you've missed the point completely.Yeah, doing it might have been an attempt to upset the bowler's length, or an attempt 'play his natural game' and launch a counter attack, but when you're 5/18, charging down the wicket on your third ball and attempting to hit over cover is not the smartest move. It doesn't take a genius to understand that.
Funny how if this was other countries there'd be an inquiry.Mazhar Majeed did mention that Aussies were in on the fixing