No one whose batting technique is to predominantly stay leg side of the ball should ever be picked in an under 11s Rep side, let alone to play for Australia as a batsman or an all rounder.Will he be good enough for test cricket or do you think he is better off trying the Symonds route of a specialist LO player?
He looks like he has raw talent to burn so hopefully he will continue to develop.
We just have to scrap the last couple years from test history I think, the admin was all over the shop. Sri Lanka was a new beginningNo one whose batting technique is to predominantly stay leg side of the ball should ever be picked in an under 11s Rep side, let alone to play for Australia as a batsman or an all rounder.
Agree with Hughes, most definitely. But he's doing it far less now - you could see in SL he had worked on his trigger movement being back and across, not back and away.We just have to scrap the last couple years from test history I think, the admin was all over the shop. Sri Lanka was a new beginning
Phil Hughes is probably in the same boat of akward technique but if they can pile on the runs maybe it's the modern way to give them a go.
I remember the story of M Slater getting coaching as a youngster where he would be rapidly instructed to play shots and focus only on technique and foot movement. Probably showed up in his test career and gives a player an edge later in their career. Cosgrove got the same kind of coaching from his pretty commited father, but I think he got a cookie for each good shot also.
He'll get absolutely ruined playing constant limited overs cricket when what he needs is regular Shield cricket in order to define himself in the longest form of the game. His batting thus far is more potential than results but I reckon he'll be an extremely handy cricketer for Australia in limited overs; I'm quite suprised he didn't bowl today because I think he's an excellent T20 bowler.
Nah ****, talking about the young blokes I have coached and played with.they would have been like 15 before t20 came to our shores though.
bowling restrictions to blame
I actually disagree with that. Take a look at the career progression of Richie Benaud and Steve Smith and, LOI cricket aside, the parallels are incredible.Would probably be a good move for Smith to outright quit either batting or bowling, focus on one of the two tbh. As long as he stays as an "all-rounder" he's going to be treated in a pretty haphazard manner.
Yeah of course. Only way to cure the back-aways is to stand behind them in the nets pointing a stump at them.bowling restrictions in ODers still to blame anyway ****
although kids slogging has always been a part of junior cricket hasn't it
Yeah exactly. Not sure why anyone would want to give the selectors less reasons to pick you.I actually disagree with that. Take a look at the career progression of Richie Benaud and Steve Smith and, LOI cricket aside, the parallels are incredible.
Remember the coaches at my junior club used to put the kids kit bag behind them when they faced up.Yeah of course. Only way to cure the back-aways is to stand behind them in the nets pointing a stump at them.
Or angle a bowling machine at leg stump at about 60 mph (for under 10s, increase the pace as they grow up)
Sure DOCS doesn't like it, but they learn how to hook and pull properly. And that's the important thing.
Remember the coaches at my junior club used to put the kids kit bag behind them when they faced up.
The only shot kids ever hit hard enough to go for four or six is generally the pull shot anyway. Just defend everything else, and pull whatever you can, haha.
Yeah, each of these a good option, just don't get to see the fear in their eyes as muchUsed to put a stump along the back of the kids heels.