It's not, but it's also not make or break. If the best man for the job played test cricket great. if he didn't, well then oh well, he's still the best man for the jobSo, a feel for cricket which will give you an understanding of whether they are actually all doing their job is a drawback?
Completely revived the Tigers (union side) over here as Director of Rugby. After Dean Richards had failed to live up to Leicester's dominant run of 1998-2002 and the Tigers had sunk from being by far the best in the league to being a mediocre premiership side, mostly thanks to an over-reliance on old players, Howard replaced him and turned the tigers back into a force - within two years he got us one match away from the Treble in 2007, before leaving.It seems a pretty broad administrative role so I'm not really against the idea, but I'd like the know who the **** this guy is and what he's done.
i don't think anybody is saying that.i definitely don't think we should pick cricket people just for the sake of it. if anything THAT'S symptomatic of our issues - oh yeah this person played cricket, let's give them the job.
If anything, Cricket Australia's biggest failing in the last couple of years has been the appointment of too many "cricket people."Have a cricket person in there?
Good God no.
Just a certain "skillset"
Probably won them over with a good powerpoint presentation, like Dean Bailey.
Seriously, how did the Rugby team go while he was their high performance manager?
Point is, unless it's somebody absolutely exceptional/irresistible, then best go with a cricket person.
The Australian middle order had been underperforming for a lot longer than just the last Ashes.The middle order not being good enough and playing England had a lot to do with it also.
Oddly enough, isn't that roughly as long as Langer has been the batting coach?The Australian middle order had been underperforming for a lot longer than just the last Ashes.
West Indies at Perth, Pakistan at Sydney, 1st Test in New Zealand, Pakistan at Headingley all saw ridiculous batting collapses from Australia. Add in the two Ashes Tests lost in 2009 as well. The Australian batting lineup has been underperforming for a long time now.
That's true, it's just they were horribly exposed in the Ashes to the point where selectors could no longer put their heads in the sand as we were still getting some results at that time. At 1-1 and the end of the Perth test all the cricketing brains trust still thought we were as good a side as England.The Australian middle order had been underperforming for a lot longer than just the last Ashes.
West Indies at Perth, Pakistan at Sydney, 1st Test in New Zealand, Pakistan at Headingley all saw ridiculous batting collapses from Australia. Add in the two Ashes Tests lost in 2009 as well. The Australian batting lineup has been underperforming for a long time now.
Do we know enough details about his full role yet?One of Australia's most experienced cricket writers shares my perfectly reasonable concerns.
Captain Michael Clarke, the new head coach and chairman of selectors will be reporting to someone who cannot explain a doosra.
This may not matter given that Howard will be performing a big picture co-ordinating role but just how will someone outside the game benchmark the performances from cricket's main men?
submitted a great video to get the jobCraig McDermott an old boys club pick
Haha, that's absolute rubbish. You don't need to have played a sport at any level to understand it. It's not like they've hired someone who until they got the job though of insects chirping at night when he heard the word 'cricket.'One of Australia's most experienced cricket writers shares my perfectly reasonable concerns.
Captain Michael Clarke, the new head coach and chairman of selectors will be reporting to someone who cannot explain a doosra.
This may not matter given that Howard will be performing a big picture co-ordinating role but just how will someone outside the game benchmark the performances from cricket's main men?