Cabinet96
Hall of Fame Member
And then will probably get dropped for a slogging batsmen who can bowl some off pies and can't play the short of moving ball.Haha! He'd be Outswinger@mediumpace within five years.
©Suresh Raina.
And then will probably get dropped for a slogging batsmen who can bowl some off pies and can't play the short of moving ball.Haha! He'd be Outswinger@mediumpace within five years.
He'd be on silentstrikers wheel of mediocrity, and would probably have to leave the forum to escape the ridicule and abuse [/stereotype]
Haha! He'd be Outswinger@mediumpace within five years.
Then England would be number 5 in the world in tests and own no global trophies.He'd beat the world record for most wickets before retiring and dying tragically young.
What if a rule was introduced stating that you could only play international cricket for the country of your birth?
Then we wouldn't see shock jocks complaining about England, and England wouldn't be the best test team in the world. Crabb would also not have Symonds to vent his spleen aboutHe'd beat the world record for most wickets before retiring and dying tragically young.
What if a rule was introduced stating that you could only play international cricket for the country of your birth?
No difference I think.Then England would be number 5 in the world in tests and own no global trophies.
What if Brad Haddin had caught Andrew Strauss of Ryan Harris at Perth in December? The next over Strauss hit Harris for 3 fours and Harris was replaced by Johnson. Johnson took wickets and Australia won the match.
The law would easily be overturned in court on the basis that it is discriminatory. It would last about 5 minutes.He'd beat the world record for most wickets before retiring and dying tragically young.
What if a rule was introduced stating that you could only play international cricket for the country of your birth?
Not much difference. Maybe it wouldn't have been a 5-0 whitewash though.What if Andrew Strauss had captained the England team on the 2006/07 Ashes tour?
Don't think captaincy was the issue and I thought that Flintoff did a good job for a losing side.What if Andrew Strauss had captained the England team on the 2006/07 Ashes tour?
2006/07 Ashes tour? Never heard of it. We played a one day series to warm up for the World Cup though.What if Andrew Strauss had captained the England team on the 2006/07 Ashes tour?
In all seriousness, it probably wouldn't have made much of a difference to the actual result. The big "what if" in zaremba's question is would leading England to an absolute drubbing have been a huge black mark on Strauss' captaincy credentials when the Pietersen/Moores thing blew up? It might have, but I don't think we really had any viable alternatives once Pietersen had been fired. Cook's place in the side was far from secure (he hadn't made a ton for over 12 months by that point) and the only other senior in the side whos place was anywhere near secure was Collingwood, who chucked the One Day captaincy 6 months prior.Not much difference. Maybe it wouldn't have been a 5-0 whitewash though.
What if Mugabe had not been a corrupt prick circa 2000?
lol, no it wouldn't.The law would easily be overturned in court on the basis that it is discriminatory. It would last about 5 minutes.
Yes it would. IYou'd be discriminating against British citizens like Pietersen amd Strauss on the basis of where they were born, that wouldn't stand up in court.lol, no it wouldn't.
Find me one piece of UK legislation which backs up your point plz.Yes it would. IYou'd be discriminating against British citizens like Pietersen amd Strauss on the basis of where they were born, that wouldn't stand up in court.
All the electronic evidence is declared inadmissable, the NotW hacks are arrested for illegally accessing the voicemails of Butt, Aamer & Asif, who're awarded punitive damages for defamation and restored to the Pakistan national team. Giles Clarke is broken by the experience, announces henceforth he wishes to be known as "Gillian" and changes gender.What if the hacking scandal was around the same time as the spot-fixing scandal?