a cricinfo comment has to be approved by someone to be posted, meaning there's two people at fault for me seeing the stupid **** commentYoutube cricket video comments vs cricinfo comments... who would take the title?
Throw online newspaper comments in there too. Some bloke in the Daily Tele comments section was going off about Khawaja's position not being safe after a Clarke comment the other day. Apparently it's 'ridiculous' for a bloke who has three 20's and a 30 to not have his position guaranteed for the rest of his life.Youtube cricket video comments vs cricinfo comments... who would take the title?
Nothing stopping Dougeh from training full tilt at the moment though. If he got really fit and shed a few kgs he would be a better bet for the test side.Based on our selectors' previous form, they will call Dougeh in without any cricket, on the flattest of flat decks in Colombo (the Adelaide of SL) in some decent heat, and then bin him if he runs out of puff.
Cos that's how we roll.
Then you're wrong.Yeah was kind of joking, but I disagree that Anderson has been better. Obviously Harris has to string together a lot more matches at this level to be a contender, but in the little he has played I think he has been better than Anderson. Don't think Anderson would be doing this well on these kind of pitches either.
Honestly, if you were interning at ESPN, you'd probably approve all the tardbastard comments just for the lols.a cricinfo comment has to be approved by someone to be posted, meaning there's two people at fault for me seeing the stupid **** comment
Pffft. In the few matches he played in the Ashes he performed equally to him (against far better batting), and I'd put my money on Harris outperforming him here if they were playing side by side as well. Anderson has shown he can perform well on relatively lifeless pitches, so I'd back him to do a good job as well, but is it really that outrageous to suggest he wouldn't have better returns than 11 wickets @ 14.54 in conditions that have offered hardly any swing? I don't know if you've been watching but Harris' bowling in this series so far has been outstanding.Then you're wrong.
Excellent news.Mendis is out of the third test due to some back problem
Sri Lanka v Australia, 2nd Test, Pallekele, 5th day: Mendis out of third Test | Cricket News | Sri Lanka v Australia | ESPN Cricinfo
MJ hasn't been bad this series and Bollinger certainly hasn't been any better. Anyway, you can't expect your three quicks to all be firing at once. There will always be a standout. This series, it just happens to be Harris.Encouraging signs so far on this tour, but our attack still worries me. We're way too reliant on Harris and Watson for penetration. And next time Harris is injured and Watson scores runs and isn't able to bowl as much (both things which are likely to happen sooner rather than later) then we're going to be in some trouble.
I'd love to see Bollinger in for Mitch. We can't afford to carry Johnson for 4 out of 5 games. We really need the 3rd seamer to front up consistently, given that Harris and Watson both have workload issues and Copeland doesn't look penetrative once the shine wears off. Having said that Johnson will probably have one of his mandatory two good games per year in the third test and take 8-fer