• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* T20 and ODI matches

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Strange call to play five actual specialist bowlers and still eff about with Ravi's little mediums, yes.

Augustus's boy looking in fair nick here. He said in no way attempting a jinx.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
The pitch supposedly doesn't offer much for the spinners so Ravi's bowling instead of Swann.
Even if the pitch was the ****test in the history of sport for bowling spin on, Swann would be a better option that Bopara...and we don't even know what the pitch is like for spin just what people have surmised
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
There's not much there for the seamer's anymore either. Swann would do better on a pitch with no spin than Ravi would do on a pitch with minimal seam 9 times out 10.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Lol they just showed a pitch map of Broad and he hasn't bowled anything on a short length. Very strange for Broad. Lol just as they show it he bowls a bouncer down the leg side.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I rate Ravi's meds tbh. Reckon he's improved them a fair bit over the past couple of years; could be a genuine fifth bowling option in ODIs (if he performed with the bat as the England heirarchy seem to think he can, anyway).

I don't think he should be bowling before Swann here, but I do think he's more than worth a bowl.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Even if the pitch was the ****test in the history of sport for bowling spin on, Swann would be a better option that Bopara...and we don't even know what the pitch is like for spin just what people have surmised
I don't agree with bowling Bopara ahead of Swann, I'm just sighting the reasons. Lol somebody on Cricinfo said there bowling Bopara because they want to chase a decent target. Somebody else said he's quicker than all of India's bowlers.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I rate Ravi's meds tbh. Reckon he's improved them a fair bit over the past couple of years; could be a genuine fifth bowling option in ODIs (if he performed with the bat as the England heirarchy seem to think he can, anyway).

I don't think he should be bowling before Swann here, but I do think he's more than worth a bowl.
He's improved, no doubt. Swings it and touches 80mph, but, as you said, you still have to bowl your premier spinner before your fifth seamer 99/100.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
That was close. Clipping top of leg, tough to give that but it looked out live (to me, so probs wrong).
 
Last edited:

Top