There's been a fairly significant amount of time lost already and both days have ended early due to bad light, so I don't think Australia can bank on getting in 180 overs should they declare overnight after batting tomorrow.Couldn't have done any better on debut. Deserves a ton tomorrow but it will be a real test for him starting again in the morning. Hussey just carried on again. When he is in good nick he doesn't half cash in. Bat all day tomorrow has to be the plan and see where they are this time tomorrow as to whether to declare or not.
Will they even need half that time though?There's been a fairly significant amount of time lost already and both days have ended early due to bad light, so I don't think Australia can bank on getting in 180 overs should they declare overnight after batting tomorrow.
Well I haven't watched much of day 2 so not really sure how the pitch is playing; bowling first in the subcontinent can sometimes be the right move if you can exploit the movement you sometimes get in the first hour (and getting 5 wickets in the morning session was a great example of Australia doing just that) so I'm not sure if Sri Lanka's below par score can be put down to conditions or just rank bad batting; in either case if the pitch has flattened out I wouldn't put it beyond Sri Lanka to bat out 2 days at home quite comfortably.Will they even need half that time though?
Fair enough, Eurosport threw up some highlights once they went off for bad light; Harris and Copeland were getting the ball to nibble around a bit off the seam from what they were showing; I dare say that if Sri Lanka had shown more application with the bat they might have been 50/1 or 2 at lunch and cashed in as the assistance wore off.Rank bad batting. There was some assistance in the first hour, but it was clear that this was a 350 minimum pitch from late in the morning session.
It wasn't that much assistance either. You'd be pretty unhappy to lose three wickets in that session, let alone five.
Yeah that's what I thought too. I was fully expecting a very long day in the field even with a few early wickets, but the batting just got worse and worse.Fair enough, Eurosport threw up some highlights once they went off for bad light; Harris and Copeland were getting the ball to nibble around a bit off the seam from what they were showing; I dare say that if Sri Lanka had shown more application with the bat they might have been 50/1 or 2 at lunch and cashed in as the assistance wore off.
Nothing will beat the time Bill Lawry admitted to not having having heard of Grant Elliott before even though it was his Elliott's third game of the tour and Lawry had not only commented in the previous two but actually called his dismissal in one of them.Had to laugh when I was watching the highlights and Tony Greig admitted he was suprised at the speeds Copeland was clocking at Galle.
You'd think a guy who works for Channel 9 might be clued up on Australian cricket.
Amazing.Nothing will beat the time Bill Lawry admitted to not having having heard of Grant Elliott before even though it was his Elliott's third game of the tour and Lawry had not only commented in the previous two but actually called his dismissal in one of them.
What about the current Australian selector who advised a player that he'd have more chance of selection if he opened the batting for his stateHad to laugh when I was watching the highlights and Tony Greig admitted he was suprised at the speeds Copeland was clocking at Galle.
You'd think a guy who works for Channel 9 might be clued up on Australian cricket.