He wouldn't open the batting though,tbf.Shane Watson would open the bowling for India
Copeland is more likely to getting outside edges while Watson is more likely to get lbws....?
Am speechless.
Hope so too, but with Johnson having bowled more overs I'm not confident.I'm hoping he's just saving Copes for the new cherry.
I didn't ask for an explanation of your ramblings, so please do not give one.Copeland is more likely to getting outside edges while Watson is more likely to get lbws.
Ok I'm going to clear this up for you.Copeland is more likely to getting outside edges while Watson is more likely to get lbws.
I didn't ask for your reply as well, so people do not give one.I didn't ask for an explanation of your ramblings, so please do not give one.
Except the bouncer reasoning, others are not.Ok I'm going to clear this up for you.
Watson is faster than Copeland, so standing outside of the crease to him becomes harder.
Watson has a better bouncer than Copeland, and more likely to use it.
The edges would invariably not carry to Haddin off Copeland.
Copeland is more accurate than Watson.
All those reasons and more.
Horrible posting. Can you give yourself a 10minute timeout of this thread please?Except the bouncer reasoning, others are not.
1. Haddin has stood up to Watson before. His pace is not that difficult.
3. That's a stupid reason. How would you know? Some might and some not. Better than getting rid of outside edge dismissal completely.
4. Watson can bowl stump to stump when the keeper is up.
Bees dick in it.Looked high.