• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in Sri Lanka

adub

International Captain
Just on this strange new idea that you somehow have to be a specialist No. 6 that seems to have been invented in the last week - who was the last Australian batsman to debut batting at 3 or 4 before Khawaja?

Hint: If you'd been born that day you'd be eligible to vote and drink legally.

It's almost unheard of for batsmen to debut anywhere other than 6, or sometimes 5 unless they're openers (or filling in for an injured opener like Huss)
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Just on this strange new idea that you somehow have to be a specialist No. 6 that seems to have been invented in the last week - who was the last Australian batsman to debut batting at 3 or 4 before Khawaja?

Hint: If you'd been born that day you'd be eligible to vote and drink legally.

It's almost unheard of for batsmen to debut anywhere other than 6, or sometimes 5 unless they're openers (or filling in for an injured opener like Huss)
It's a weird attitude, isn't it? England's entire middle order was shifted in order to debut Trott at no. 5, even though he didn't normally bat there and England had no intention of him batting there long term.

Pakistan, of course, defy convention big style by debuting their nos. 3 and 4, Azhar Ali and Umar Amin, in the same match. They then went on to debut Wahab Riaz at no. 3, just to mess with us.
 
Last edited:

Spark

Global Moderator
Does anyone have any idea what the SL attack will be? Herath will play, Mendis is likely, but beyond that I don't really have any idea. Welegedara + Lakmal? And surely they'll pick six specialist bats this time (Mathews being one of them)?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Youngsters being dropped isn't the end of the world. If they are good enough, they'll get back in the team. Most players get dropped at some point in their career. It doesn't automatically follow that it ****s them up. If it did, none of them would ever be seen again.
Yeah AWTA. Clarke got dropped in 05/6. Best thing that ever happened to him. Made a double hundred the next week. That's how you make your name as a cricketer.
 

aussie tragic

International Captain
Just on this strange new idea that you somehow have to be a specialist No. 6 that seems to have been invented in the last week - who was the last Australian batsman to debut batting at 3 or 4 before Khawaja?
Interesting, so here are some examples of where the top Aussie run scorers debuted

Ponting - No. 5
Border - No. 6
S. Waugh - No. 6
M. Waugh - No. 6
Boon - No. 6
G. Chappell - No. 7 :-O
Bradman - No. 7 :-O
Harvey - No. 6
Walters - No. 6

only two exceptions (non opener)...I.Chappell and Langer debuted at No. 3
 
Last edited:

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
gotta admit i'm having a lot of fun thinking of people and checking - thought for sure ian craig would have been at 4 but alas.
 

adub

International Captain
Australia's highest runs scorers:

Ponting - debuted at 5 (S Law debuted same game at 6 - Ponting back to 6 next game)
Border - 6
S Waugh - 6
Hayden - Opener
M Waugh - 6
Langer - 3
Taylor - Opener
Boon - 6
G Chappell - 7
Bradman - 7
Harvey - 6
Gilchrist - 7
Walters - 6
I Chappell - 3
Slater - Opener
Lawry - Opener
Simpson - 6
Clarke - 6
Redpath - Opener
Hussey - Opener
Hughes - 4
Martyn - 5 (Border 6)
Healy - 8
Katich - 6
R Marsh - 7
Jones - 7
Morris - Opener
Clem Hill - yep even in 1896 we debuted our batmen at 6
Wood - Opener
Trumper - you guessed it 6
Warne - 10
McDonald - Opener
Hassett - 6
Miller - 4
Armstrong - 9
G Marsh - 3
Stackpole - 8
O'Neil - 4
Yallop - 3
McCabe - 6
Blewett - 6
Bardsley - opener (batted 6 in the 2nd innings)
Woodfull - dnb (batted 4 and 6 in his 2nd test)
Burge - 6
Syd Gregory - 6
Benaud - 7
McCartney - 7 (opened in 2nd innings)
Ponsford - 3 (5 in 2nd innings despite scoring a debut ton)
Cowper - 6

49 Australians who have scored more than 2000 test runs. 30 of them batted at 6 or lower on debut and 10 opened (Bardsley doing both). For 130+ years we've been sending our new batsmen in at 6 to get them acclimatised to test cricket, but now we can't push a guy back to 6 because he played his first test at 3?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah it's laughably stupid. Unless you're rank terrible starting against spin, there's no reason you can't bat #6 if you can bat #3.
 

SamSawnoff

U19 Vice-Captain
Yeah AWTA. Clarke got dropped in 05/6. Best thing that ever happened to him. Made a double hundred the next week. That's how you make your name as a cricketer.
If it does stuff them up, it just means they probably weren't tough enough for international cricket anyway.

I find it really weird that people seem to think a youngster being dropped will somehow lose all will to be good. If they love the sport and love competing, it should spur them on.

No-one in their sporting careers has ever had it easy the whole way through.

Well, I'm not sure about Mitch Marsh to be honest.:laugh:
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
i love how of the few guys on that list to actually start at 3/4 like half of them made their names as openers anyway (Ponsford, Marsh, Langer, Woodfull)



.....actually....USMAN TO OPENER
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Two days out the question needs to be asked - Beer or Lyon?
From a winning-this-series point of view, definitely Lyon for me, and it's not even particularly close. I do worry that it might ruin him and get him canned prematurely though so it might almost be worth burning Beer here to get the best out of Lyon later.
 

Top