Haha, neutrality isn't a contractual obligation .I see you're hoping for a competitive series, as a neutral.
Same for me as well. Looked to me that Warne was just suggesting the approach that Strauss should take and not to be content with 1-0. Cricinfo twisting the words as like any other news publications.interesting predictions from some of the past players......interestingly i didn't reach the same conclusion for Shane Warne's words as cricinfo did
'England are just going to do enough and win 1-0' | The Short Stuff | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Was joking TBH.Haha, neutrality isn't a contractual obligation .
I just want to see good cricket, and bad decisions ruin the sport. Of course I'm going to want the pro-bad-decisions side to lose.
Also I have £100 on England. But I'm not going to pretend I wouldn't want them to win anyway.
DisCould have had it for LBW' s except some tracking and predictive path.
haha.....indeedSame for me as well. Looked to me that Warne was just suggesting the approach that Strauss should take and not to be content with 1-0. Cricinfo twisting the words as like any other news publications.
yepHaha that's terrible journalism. And there was only one thing to do...
Ugh, whichever way it goes, I hope more than one Test match will yield a result.Same for me as well. Looked to me that Warne was just suggesting the approach that Strauss should take and not to be content with 1-0. Cricinfo twisting the words as like any other news publications.
Anyone got a Sky Sports stream? This Star Cricket coverage is painful.
awesome stuffOooh. We've got this, in HD, on Kiwi TV. Nice.