It wasn't all that clear to me; all that I could make out from the TV replays was that the ball was desperately close to the gloves.lol what? Clearly not out. Hence he benefited from it. jesus
the bat/glove was nowhere near the line of the ball.to ur eyes only.... umpire felt it was out, replays were inconclusive....
The bat does not look to be anywhere close to the line of the ball, took the flap of the front pad on its way in to his body and lobbed to the fielder, another West Indies batsman done in by the umpire /Cricinfo.to ur eyes only.... umpire felt it was out, replays were inconclusive....
He's given a few bad decisions hasn't he?It wasn't all that clear to me; all that I could make out from the TV replays was that the ball was desperately close to the gloves.
Agreed that the benefit of doubt should go to the batsman in these situations, but I would give some leeway to Kettleborough here. Actually think he's better than quite a few umpires on the ICC panel.
Two I think, though I wouldn't classify either as outright howlers. Cricinfo does though; and now he'll begin to have a reputation with the fans.He's given a few bad decisions hasn't he?
It wasn't all that clear to me; all that I could make out from the TV replays was that the ball was desperately close to the gloves.
Agreed that the benefit of doubt should go to the batsman in these situations, but I would give some leeway to Kettleborough here. Actually think he's better than quite a few umpires on the ICC panel.
the ball was perilously close to the gloves.The bat does not look to be anywhere close to the line of the ball, took the flap of the front pad on its way in to his body and lobbed to the fielder, another West Indies batsman done in by the umpire /Cricinfo.
TBF to the umpire it wasn't the easiest of decisions, though.
No problem as long as he has BCCI on his side.Two I think, though I wouldn't classify either as outright howlers. Cricinfo does though; and now he'll begin to have a reputation with the fans.