It was nipping off the pitch pretty heavily as well, look at bresnan's bowling he was all seam. And in anycase all the swing went away after a dozen or so overs. And now the swing isn't there at all. And more importantly the wicket looks much drier & skiddier. Hell, england looked much less comfortable playing at lords where the pitch was supposed to be 280+ pitch.I was pointing out that the one-sided nature in this match comes from England using the swinging conditions far better. And that it has sod all to do with the pitch. There is a difference between swing and seam, and the former does not rely on the pitch.
Or not!Spin! This will tie us down..
Probably a pretty crap wicketkeeper though.It's almost laughable the extent to which Cook is a better batsman than Kieswetter. Sometimes it really is that simple. He's just a better batsman.
He knows, you know. Has a direct line to them.Alastair Cook said:the cricketing gods may look at that in a bit of disgust.
The fact that it was a 50/50 LBW just proves it. I wonder what point Cook sold his soul to become a world-class opener. Grateful he did ofc.Speaking of Cook as we are, when I saw Chandimal's blob today I thought of the skipper's words after the 3rd ODI:
He knows, you know. Has a direct line to them.
As we've discussed...Cook lucky there