How did you end up getting stuck in the 19th century?
Was the DeLorean playing up again?
All of this. All of it.Also in favour of randomising alternate rounds and no restrictions at all on the time periods. Fine with the 10 Test rule. In favour of a 12 hours per pick time frame, and participants who don't end up picking when its their turn should mandatorily end up at the end of that particular round (and the next, if the next round is a mirror image round), rather than pick whenever they turn up. It wasn't pleasant last time when there doubts on the intentions of latecomers, would rather we avoid that sort of controversy by having this rule in place.
I'd want to see alternate round randomisation, to prevent a situation where a participant suffers more than the others just for having to (almost) always pick after another specific participant who's particularly good at deliberately excluding players with his scorecard selections. IMO we'll see the scorecard exclusions used as a tactic a lot more this time round now that we've got a hang of the game. Plus true randomisation (with the NUFAN fix) adds to the fun because you never know which period you'll have to select from next!
Also in favour of letting as many people in as possible. I loved that we had 18 (?) participants last time.
A good point, actually. NUFAN fix?I'd want to see alternate round randomisation, to prevent a situation where a participant suffers more than the others just for having to (almost) always pick after another specific participant who's particularly good at deliberately excluding players with his scorecard selections. IMO we'll see the scorecard exclusions used as a tactic a lot more this time round now that we've got a hang of the game. Plus true randomisation (with the NUFAN fix) adds to the fun because you never know which period you'll have to select from next!
Yeah, last year NUFAN pointed out a fatal flaw in going with a simple snake in this draft, wherein a player with two consecutive picks could set up a selection for himself on his second go. He later suggested a fix for it in post #185. Read on from about this post when we were discussing whether or not to randomise alternate rounds - http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/47447-scorecard-draft-5.html#post2274652A good point, actually. NUFAN fix?
wubAll of this. All of it.
Updated the rules. I think that should give us a fair leeway to pick a few 1890/1900 greats.In, but can we clarify the 1900 rules - is it they can't have played any games before 1900 or they can't have played all their games before 1900?