Yes, I thought that's the point, I'd rather have KP in my side because he offers something different to Laxman.It's hardly likely that KP's a better player than Laxman right now, but if you think he'll have a great series, what's wrong with that?
What exactly?Yes, I thought that's the point, I'd rather have KP in my side because he offers something different to Laxman.
Can take attacks apart, scores very quickly, why, I think it's pretty obvious the difference between the 2.What exactly?
A lack of form.What exactly?
Didn't know we were comparing them in ODIs and T20s, if that's the case you've a point.Can take attacks apart, scores very quickly, why, I think it's pretty obvious the difference between the 2.
toucheA lack of form.
Spot the guy who didn't watch KP bat yesterdayA lack of form.
Yeah coz KP has never taken a Test attack apart before. He didn't take the best attack of the century apart on his debut or anything and then made a habit of doing it for the following four years.Didn't know we were comparing them in ODIs and T20s, if that's the case you've a point.
Spot the guy who didn't watch KP bat yesterday
Yeah coz KP has never taken a Test attack apart before. He didn't take the best attack of the century apart on his debut or anything and then made a habit of doing it for the following four years.
As if Laxman has never done that to any test attack
Or failed to step up when the team needed him most to..
Specifically said from his debut onwards. I have a mate who works in Customs. Gonna get him to make your life hell, bitch.We gonna bring 2005 up?
Gonna bring up Eden Gardens 2001 next
You said KP has no form. It's not true.Yesterday eh? Form in one day bursts. Harbhajan Singh is the greatest bowler of all time since he averages 7 wickets per innings - if you only take his last test innings into account.
KP still averages 41 since the beginning of 2010.
I didn't say it's a crime.Do please try to calm down. KP on form is a world-class player, and given how he's now batting he looks in good touch. Laxman is a fine player but it's not a crime, under English law, to suggest that an in-form KP might get into a combined team ahead of him. The position under Indian law might be different, I just don't know.
4 reasons why one might reasonably pick KP ahead of Laxman, irrespective of nationality:I didn't say it's a crime.
But it's lacking in logic. More so when an attempt is made down to play down Laxman. I can understand people selecting KP with nothing more than a nationalist cap on. Fair enough, let's not try justify it with other logic or else it would look downright silly.
WTF are you being deliberately obtuse?Didn't know we were comparing them in ODIs and T20s, if that's the case you've a point.
recent form?4 reasons why one might reasonably pick KP ahead of Laxman, irrespective of nationality:
- Better Test average
- Scores more centuries
- Scores more quickly
- Home town advantage
I've no particular desire to get involved in a tedious statsfight, btw.
I agree and just for example of why I'd have KP, in the Ashes when he scored 227 in 308 balls, he did that because the rain was coming in and England were going to run out of time to bowl Aus out. If he didn't score as quickly and as many as he did, England probably wouldn't have won the 2nd test because it rained all day, hour after England took the last wicket.4 reasons why one might reasonably pick KP ahead of Laxman, irrespective of nationality:
- Better Test average
- Scores more centuries
- Scores more quickly
- Home town advantage
I've no particular desire to get involved in a tedious statsfight, btw.