• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Sri Lanka in England / Scotland - 2011

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Err no. 4/40 is pretty bad but 180 is still not great, and you'd not be happy with <200. Slightly less **** is still ****.

Hmm, Strauss...
Leaves Sri Lanka in the game, though. Even if they were to get England out for 250, if the sun comes out in England a 70 run lead can start to look quite trivial.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Leaves Sri Lanka in the game, though. Even if they were to get England out for 250, if the sun comes out in England a 70 run lead can start to look quite trivial.
True. But anyone who's happy with putting up 180 first dig is kidding themselves, really. It's still a pretty bad score.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Strauss not a fan of the out-of-form-but-ground-out 50 is he? Such a rocks or diamonds player.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
True. But anyone who's happy with putting up 180 first dig is kidding themselves, really. It's still a pretty bad score.
Sure, and no-one's saying they'd have taken it at the start of the innings. But when your top four including your two bests batters have gone for less than 40, you're left with one guy with a healthy overall test average but much less so outside the SC and looking all over the place in this series, a kid who's probably a place too high at 6 and numbers 7 to 9 probably a couple of places too high, all in thoroughly helpful conditions for the bowlers ....... SL will know as well as anyone that they could very easily have been facing an absolute disaster.

Instead, they have a score that's unquestionably low but might keep them somewhere in the game if things go their way in equally helpful conditions now that England are batting.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I felt we should have been looking to get them out for 130 or so. We did let them off a bit at the end I thought.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The level of analysis you get on SkySports is really very good. Interesting discussion going on about using the new ball and seam position.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Sure, and no-one's saying they'd have taken it at the start of the innings. But when your top four including your two bests batters have gone for less than 40, you're left with one guy with a healthy overall test average but much less so outside the SC and looking all over the place in this series, a kid who's probably a place too high at 6 and numbers 7 to 9 probably a couple of places too high, all in thoroughly helpful conditions for the bowlers ....... SL will know as well as anyone that they could very easily have been facing an absolute disaster.

Instead, they have a score that's unquestionably low but might keep them somewhere in the game if things go their way in equally helpful conditions now that England are batting.
Yeah, inclined to agree. A draw away at St James Park isn't an awful result, but when the visitors had been 4-0 up it'd be disingenous to say Newcastle wouldn't be delighted with a point.

Purely hypothetical example. :ph34r:
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It seems like Cook hasn't played and missed at one in about a decade now. FFS, do something wrong. Anything.
 

Top