They weren't against drug testing per se, and the reason was very much a legitimate one. The players were concerned about a "whereabouts" clause, IIRC. That and the UDRS issue are two entirely different things.It's about time UDRS was made mandatory. It's hardly fair if it's used in every series other than ones involving India.
Of course, the BCCI was against drug testing too, for some backwards reason.
Completely true but why bother about facts when you can indulge in some BCCI-bashing?They weren't against drug testing per se, and the reason was very much a legitimate one. The players were concerned about a "whereabouts" clause, IIRC. That and the UDRS issue are two entirely different things.
wtf?grow spine. Talk open. Talk transparent.
for egs look to katman.
Whether or not UDRS is perfect and could in some way be improved doesn't matter, what does matter is whether its better than the old system, which it is.Come on, who are we kidding? The umpires have shown that they have a tendency to throw common sense out the window and go by the rule book just for the heck of it in instances. The 2.5 meter rule for instance in the WC. In one game it wasn't out and in another game it was out. I bet the BCCI would consider using the UDRS if every test they play was umpired by smart umpires. I guess their gripe is with the standard of the umpires in the elite panel rather than the UDRS itself.
Yes.Does anyone think technology makes worse decisions than human umpires?
If you don't answer yes, then I'd like to hear a good reason why we should abandon UDRS.
ffs I thought I got rid of you a couple of pages backYes.
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THlNKYes.
You expect the ECB to take the letter seriously after signing off with that?Hello, I've just come to know that the BCCI are opposing the use of UDRS in the upcoming test series. That's a complete joke, in my opinion.
It's my understanding that the home team has the biggest say regarding the UDRS and I request that the ECB insist strongly that the UDRS is used. The opposition behind the UDRS stems from atrocious reasoning such as Bell not being given out during the WC game vs India which, guess what, would not have been given out even is the UDRS was not present. It is scary that the cricket body which represents the most massive fan base is so illogical and stubborn.
I'm an Indian fan living in India and almost every serious test cricket fan I know is for the UDRS. While it isn't a perfect system, It's a step forward and it's outright stupid not to prefer a 95% system over an 80% system just because the former is not 100%.
With diminishing but still present hope in cricket governance,
Teja
You were actually serious? You only became a convert after it helped Sachin with an LBW?Became a UDRS convert after the WC semifinal
The whereabouts clause has been perfectly acceptable to every other sport out there, including sports many Indians compete in. Only Indian cricketers were apparently troubled by it. That's another issue though.They weren't against drug testing per se, and the reason was very much a legitimate one. The players were concerned about a "whereabouts" clause, IIRC. That and the UDRS issue are two entirely different things.
Other Indian sports are a different planet compared to cricket.. Just a shame people can't realize that.The whereabouts clause has been perfectly acceptable to every other sport out there, including sports many Indians compete in. Only Indian cricketers were apparently troubled by it. That's another issue though.