Clearly he didn't check, because it seems it did.I am with Daemon.
He didn't kill anybody, he just is a born cricketer, and played it! He checked with the authorities whether it fell under the ECB jurisdiction and was informed it did not and he played. How can he take more precautions?
Yeah. I've only studied Law at a relatively low level compared to the legal boffs we have on here but the first thing we learned pretty much was that ignorance is no defence to contravention of the law.am no lawyer, but i believe that the onus was on him, in consultation with his lawyer, to make absolutely certain that he was not going be in contravention of the ban. just asking the club chappies about whether it was ok smacks of idiocy at the very least and blatant conniving disingenuousness at the worst.
should be cut no slack whatsoever. sound like a martinet but hey there has to be a limit somewhere.
Not killing anyone is not a defence...and if it is, I look forward to committing a lot of misdemeanours that don't include murder/manslaughter.I am with Daemon.
He didn't kill anybody, he just is a born cricketer, and played it! He checked with the authorities whether it fell under the ECB jurisdiction and was informed it did not and he played. How can he take more precautions?
Just surprising no is talking about the club playing one of the most publicly banned cricketers in history having made a bit of a stupid move.Yeah but unless they blatantly lied to Amir it doesn't make a difference to his case
Can they be penalised for fielding an illegal player? If it's a league game, you'd think so.Surely the club is in the wrong here too?
Yep. He's a goldmine of moronic behavior.Wait he walked into court wearing that?
!overall this still doesn't beat
as my fav Amir moment