He said it was a fact.TBF he doesn't technically agree with them.
not to mention a couple vs india last summer.Mahela Jayawardene - "Lots of people have commented on the fact that this is Sri Lanka's first Test since Muttiah Muralitharan retired, and it's true our bowlers don't have the same variety now that he's not in the side - which is the main reason why we chose five of them for this match. But we have to move on from Murali, because we're not going to get him back."
Mahela Jayawardene: Forget day five at Cardiff | Opinion | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Obviously Mahela doesn't remember he played in 3 test matches (minus the retired Murali) against the West Indies last November and December.
Mahela Jayawardene - "Lots of people have commented on the fact that this is Sri Lanka's first Test since Muttiah Muralitharan retired, and it's true our bowlers don't have the same variety now that he's not in the side - which is the main reason why we chose five of them for this match. But we have to move on from Murali, because we're not going to get him back."
Mahela Jayawardene: Forget day five at Cardiff | Opinion | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Obviously Mahela doesn't remember he played in 3 test matches (minus the retired Murali) against the West Indies last November and December.
Tbf, except for Roach's bowling and Gayle's triple century ,there was not much to remember in that series.Mahela Jayawardene - "Lots of people have commented on the fact that this is Sri Lanka's first Test since Muttiah Muralitharan retired, and it's true our bowlers don't have the same variety now that he's not in the side - which is the main reason why we chose five of them for this match. But we have to move on from Murali, because we're not going to get him back."
Mahela Jayawardene: Forget day five at Cardiff | Opinion | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
Obviously Mahela doesn't remember he played in 3 test matches (minus the retired Murali) against the West Indies last November and December.
Well had zaheer played the series.......stilll reckon had Murali completed the series Sl would have won it.
Had Arvinda played the series...Well had zaheer played the series.......
Had Arvinda played the series...
Zaheer was injured hence unavailable Murali was in a condition to play but just decided to call it quits in the middle of a series which tbf had happened before.
.I made a post just based on a random thought that crossed my mind as I saw Jono and TT discussing the SL-India series then you end up coming up with 1001 reasons to refute my post.Murali had been avging 45+ for 1.5 years.
His fitness had gone down as well btw..I made a post just based on a random thought that crossed my mind as I saw Jono and TT discussing the SL-India series then you end up coming up with 1001 reasons to refute my post.
All I remember is Murali winning a test match and then retiring in the middle of the series which looked strange to me especially as the series was still undecided and the test they lost got tight which they could have won with Murali in the side.
there was quite a bit of speculation in the media that bopara, by dint of his county performances coupled with his decision to explicitly indicate where his priorities lay, would get the nod ahead of morgan.England news: Ravi Bopara disappointed by England snub | England Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo
Seriously, where did cricinfo get this idea that Bopara was "widely tipped" to play in the first test, and in what way was Morgan "not in the frame for selection until his breakthrough innings" against Sri Lanka. So much pointlessly pro-Bopara nonsense in this article.
Not a massively important point, but it is a little irritating.