Can't see Beer getting one - won't take 3 spinners on the list.My guess at the 25
1 Katich
2 Watson
3 ponting
4 khawajah
5 M Hussey
6 Clarke
7 Haddin
8 Hauritz
9 Johnson
10 Harris
11 Bollinger
12 Siddle
13 Smith
14 Lee
15 Doherty
16 J Pattinson
17 D Hussey
18 Hughes
19 S marsh
20 Fergurson
21 Mcdonald
22 Paine
23 Beer
24 Copeland
25 Hilfenhaus.
Hmmm, I would interpret it differently if they dropped him from the contract list. I would see it as correcting a mistake, quietly excising him from the team like a tumour. The bad feeling from a guy getting picked when he didn't deserve it certainly spreads like one and I'd be more concerned with that than how he might personally feel. That's life.Beer will be certain to gain a contract.
If the selectors seen something in Beer outside of his modest first class statistics, then they need to stick with him. He did all that could be expected of him at Test level. To drop him now and not give him a contract only further proves the selectors have NFI.
That would hurt the state teams though.I don't see why they should pick 25. They keep picking many of the same players in each format unless they 'retire' from that format, so why 25? None of them appear to be earning their keep. Seems like a great wheeze to me.
If CA are so obsessed with money, why don't they try saving some and announcing that there is just isn't enough players who deserve contracts and they are going to only give out 20? Just because someone doesn't have a contract, doesn't mean they won't get picked if our selectors decide to use a little imagination. Look at David Hussey.
It would be the first bit of honesty I've heard from them in years.
Yes, I suppose so. But some of these guys are massively over-paid.That would hurt the state teams though.
I do agree, but I think the less contracts given out the less chance we're going to find a new generation of good cricketers in state cricket.Yes, I suppose so. But some of these guys are massively over-paid.