• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Sri Lanka in England / Scotland - 2011

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
did anyone mention that when dilshan got out there was a clear mark on his glove but the ball also went onto his thigh pad and there wasn't a mark. maybe my mind is playing tricks on me but that's what i thought happened. fast forward here and no real mark again,
 

Spark

Global Moderator
if the udrs technology - hot spot - was inconclusive, why change the decision?
I don't think no Hotspot should be used any more as a definite "not edged", given how many times I've seen thin nicks - that are definitely nicks - not show up.

But I'd like some convincing on that one myself.

Terrible, terrible shot though.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
wow wtf

sound is low on mine and visual quality is an issue, but i wasn't sure he'd hit that. was it different for others?
It was pretty clearly out IMO. It definitely hit something as it went past and there's no way it was anything other than glove/bat/handle.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Slow motion replays with audio are also part of UDRS technology and that was conclusive.
Not it wasn't, you couldn't see the depth of it to determine whether or not it was glove or arm.

I have a feeling it probably was glove. But probability isn't enough to overturn the on field decision.
 

hang on

State Vice-Captain
I don't think no Hotspot should be used any more as a definite "not edged", given how many times I've seen thin nicks - that are definitely nicks - not show up.

But I'd like some convincing on that one myself.

Terrible, terrible shot though.
makes sense but the whole if there is any doubt the benefit should go to the batsman thingy should hold or have they got rid off it? very confusing.

anyways, good for the game as far as i am concerned! a victory from this situation...unbelievable.
 
Last edited:

TopCat

U19 12th Man
Not it wasn't, you couldn't see the depth of it to determine whether or not it was glove or arm.

I have a feeling it probably was glove. But probability isn't enough to overturn the on field decision.
Sniko has clearly shown it was off his glove.
 

Top