If Thomas doesn't have a good game saturday then ***** ******Jacob Surjan dropped...bit early to start tanking port
Higgins the only real loss IMO. Hall was never going to kick goals against the Pies, and Hudson has been in ordinary touch this year and I back an in form Minson to be good enough against a Jolly-less Pies outfit.By the way, looking at the Bulldogs outs... it's fair to say that can't beat Collingwood. Was going to be tough even with their full team. But without Hudson, Higgins and Hall it's going to near impossible.
Theory is to let Bruce play the quarterback role that Hodge has, so that they can always play Hodge in the midfield and rotate him up forward.and why did they bother with bruce, hale i can understand but what on earth does bruce offer
Agh, thought I multi-quoted Benchy's reply too, but oh well. He has had that reputation, but as Benchy said it was a bit of a confidence thing. Even at school he'd end up having more handpasses than kicks, he'd just take a tackle on and release someone else.Benchy, didn't Watson circa 2006-07 have a reputation as being an ordinary kick? I'm fairly certain of it, particularly when kicking for goal.
Ling never really played that much as an out-and-out on-baller. He was recruited as a forward, and then built up such a ridiculous tank that they started using him as a tagger. Remember Bucks wiping blood on him? That was only about a season or two into his career.Yeah could easily follow in Ling's footsteps. Ling in the early-to-mid 2000s was a proper in the guts midfielder. As Geelong developed better players for such a role, he adapted into being one of the game's leading taggers. Cross could do that, or something similar to what Kane Cornes does at his peak.
Yeah, his massive tank meant that he ended up getting decent stats the whole way through, as we were known as a "promising team" (2002 - 2005) he was tagging. He was one of the first to set the standard of taking your man the other way, after the likes of Libba, Franchini and co. happy to limit their guy to as little disposals as possible, and end up with less than 10 himself. Kane Cornes, Stenglein, etc. followed after him in that respect.I remember him being a full forward prior to playing AFL, but in 2004 and 2005 he got a fair bit of the ball. Was he tagging in those years?
awful stuff from ROK. He's been dreadful.Judd. So, so good. That work on the boundary line there was sublime. WAC.
Yeah, no good from ROK at all. Jack was keeping Judd quiet til he got hurt, but he was always going to have a say. Such a player.Could have told the coach at half time that ROK on Judd and Goodes up forward wasn't working. Happy with Mumford's 131 but he should have gone for goal at the end
ROK on the other hand...he wasn't even trying to tag Judd like Gibbs on Goodes. He was trying to hurt Judd on defence too and he didn't do it. Very poor match.