Yup you have a point.Hmm.. nothing wrong with debuting a 31 year old batsman if he really deserves it. See Mike Hussey, etc.
Are you seriously telling me you'd complain if Badri was to average say, 70 after 25 Tests, and help us thrash the likes of England and Australia? I'd take any kind of protracted decline afterwards if you offered me that.. bird in hand and all that.Yup you have a point.
But the highlighted part is precisely what scares the hell out of me. Australia did that consistently, and ended up being in a state of eternal transition. Mike Hussey didn't last long enough; he was too old by the time he started
Obviously I would be overjoyed if he could do that.Are you seriously telling me you'd complain if Badri was to average say, 70 after 25 Tests, and help us thrash the likes of England and Australia? I'd take any kind of protracted decline afterwards if you offered me that.. bird in hand and all that.
I would have assumed the former.It seemed that way 8 months ago. But it could go either way now. I mean Pujara played the 3rd test vs. South Africa whilst Vijay didn't. Is that because the team see Pujara better suited to the lower order, or because he has leapfrogged Vijay in the pecking order?
Yes. Filled in at #3 for Dravid a couple of times and once, I believe, for Laxman at #5 - that was an away test dont recall which and he was the main spare batsman.I would have assumed the former.
Cbf checking, but has Vijay played a Test where Sehwag and Gambhir have both been available?
Are you sure? Because I don't recall something like this. Pretty much all the time he played GG was either injured or unavailable.Yes. Filled in at #3 for Dravid a couple of times and once, I believe, for Laxman at #5 - that was an away test dont recall which and he was the main spare batsman.
I would have assumed the former.
Cbf checking, but has Vijay played a Test where Sehwag and Gambhir have both been available?
Yes. Filled in at #3 for Dravid a couple of times and once, I believe, for Laxman at #5 - that was an away test dont recall which and he was the main spare batsman.
Replaced an injured Dravid in these matches:Are you sure? Because I don't recall something like this. Pretty much all the time he played GG was either injured or unavailable.
Like in this WC, his path back in may be through his bowling. Might not be that much worse than Ojha and may provide a solution to the perennial 4 bowlers or 5 bowlers dilemma.Tbh, I am actually very tempted to give Yuvraj another shot in Tests. Let's face it, the man has talent. And if he can somehow, just somehow, come good for us in Tests, we will really benefit the way we have in ODIs from his services. And what better time than now, when his confidence is sky high?
Definitely not worse than Harbhajan most of the time. After Kumble called it a day, Harbhajan bowling competently - like in the tour to SA recently - is just an all too rare blip.Like in this WC, his path back in may be through his bowling. Might not be that much worse than Ojha and may provide a solution to the perennial 4 bowlers or 5 bowlers dilemma.
Actually, for Tests, I expect one spinner to play....Even if they were all fit, you just know the Windies will select Benn and Bishoo/Miller.
Oh God, no! If Yuvraj wants to play, Let him make his way through domestic performances for the next 2 years. He had his chance(hundreds of them) and blew it, He has to earn another.Tbh, I am actually very tempted to give Yuvraj another shot in Tests. Let's face it, the man has talent. And if he can somehow, just somehow, come good for us in Tests, we will really benefit the way we have in ODIs from his services. And what better time than now, when his confidence is sky high?