Mate... You keep going on with this whole dump the oldies and bring in the rooks thing
I've consistently stated that I would retain two of the old guard (two out of Haddin, Ponting, Hussey and Katich) but certainly not all four. My point is, we just got humiliated in our backyard with
all these four older players in the team. I can understand clinging to old guys who are performing and helping us win and stay at the top of world cricket (Warne, McGrath etc), but you don't cling to old guys who are part of a team that's getting lapped (we're ranked 5th in the world, and just lost by an innings on three separate occassion to the 4th ranked team in the world in our own backyard).
but are there really many young domestic batsmen around who really have the performances to deserve a test cap.?
I look at it the other way mate....
Did Hussey deserve a Test cap over the past two years? Did Ponting, who averaged in the teens against the Poms, and has averaged sub 40 in the last two years, acquit himself well? Did Marcus North deserve such a long run? The point is that how on earth could potential replacements have done any worse than what our batsmen have served up since Ashes 2009? Even if they did as bad, at least there's scope for improvement in guys like Ferguson, Usman, Lynn, Smith etc. There's none in Hussey, Ponting, North, Katich etc. That's the whole point in going for younger players - it's not about their birth certificates rather it's that their games have scope for improvement in a way that already underperforming players such as Hussey's, Ponting's, Katich's do not.
I think Ricky made a good point during the worldcup that in his time a batsman with a domestic average less than 60 won't usually be considered for higher honours, and frankly speaking those are the sort of standards the selectors and the upcoming domestic batsmen need to have in their minds.
The pitches are far more sporting these days in Shield cricket, so the comparison is a little unfair. The problem is that people look for the perfect set of stats in looking for a replacement (while at the same time tolerating appalling performances served up by our Test bats since Ashes 2009). There's nothing wrong with Callum Ferguson's FC record for instance over the past two years. In fact, it's mirrored the promise he's showed in his ODI career during that same period. His FC record is much more nuanced that just merely quoting his overall average of 35. Likewise, Usman's FC record is outstanding as is Chris Lynn's from Queensland. Let's not forget that Slater was picked after just one good FC season, as was Martyn.
Ponting as I have said previously has been weighed down by injuries and burden of captaincy, but I have little doubt that he is going comeback really strongly now and writing him off just yet isn't fair.
I hope he does mate.
But it frankly shocks me the number of people on here who expect Ponting to come out and be a gun over the next two or three years. He's had big problems against pace bowling since Roach roughed him up some 18 months ago. He averages less than 40 over the past two years, and he's coming off an Ashes series where he averaged in the teens. To think that a 37 year old such as that will come out and blaze away for the next couple of years shows in my view little understanding of the history of cricket, and the demands of professional sport as you age. He may come out and smash it, but on the balance of probabilities, it's likely he won't.