I can think of plenty of crimes that a lot of people don't give a **** about, it's not actually relevant to whether they should be protected. And given that the amount of people in this country who watch and care about cricket (before we consider those watching around the world) is a hardly insignificant amount, then your point about taxpayers' money being wasted becomes even more ridiculous.
What they did was illegal. You break the law, you face the consequences. No ifs and no buts.
How is it ridiculous, spot/match fixing will continue whether or not these three are prosecuted. The real criminals (bookies) are still out there, looking for their next batch of pray. As long as there is money being thrown around, illegal betting is big business. These three are just scapegoats and the CPS is prosecuting them in order to look like they are doing something about the problem.
The trio have been charged on two different accounts:
i) Accepting corrupt payments is an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and carries a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
Well for this case only Butt has been caught with the marked bills and therefore Amir and Asif have no connection to this (remember Riaz was seen accepting the cash but he hasn't been charged so there probably won't be any evidence against Amir and Asif).
ii) Cheating is an offence contrary to Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005. It carries a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
In this case there is probable case for indictment. Therefore let's have a look at the section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005:
Cheating
(1)A person commits an offence if he—
(a)cheats at gambling, or
(b)does anything for the purpose of enabling or assisting another person to cheat at gambling.
(2)For the purposes of subsection (1) it is immaterial whether a person who cheats—
(a)improves his chances of winning anything, or
(b)wins anything.
(3)
Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1) cheating at gambling may, in particular, consist of actual or attempted deception or interference in connection with—
(a)the process by which gambling is conducted, or
(b)a real or virtual game, race or other event or process to which gambling relates.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, to a fine or to both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.
(5)In the application of subsection (4) to Scotland the reference to 51 weeks shall have effect as a reference to six months.
(6)Section 17 of the Gaming Act 1845 (c. 109) (winning by cheating) shall cease to have effect.
The real concern for the trio is the highlighted part; section 3. However how can CPS prove that they were gambling or were going to gamble. Money was paid to Majeed for a demonstration. Also how will they prove that Amir and Asif were involved in the whole scam because there isn't any connection between Asif and Amir to Majeed other than he being their sports agent.
Then doesn't this gambling act also affect other players who have participated in spot/match fixing like Gibbs or Lilly ( I realise that this only came into affect in 2005 and that those incidents happened in other countries, but still why have they been let off).