• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* - Pakistan in New Zealand 2010/2011

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Proves that Butt/Amir/Asif are guilty :ph34r:.

Pakistan since the spot-fixing broke have performed much better as a team I feel.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Wow, they aren't using UDRS right? They shouldn't be looking at whether there was an inside edge or not using replays if the umpires didn't think so..
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Kane gone now. He better watch out for Ross Taylor's diamond studded bat coming straight for his head when he gets back to the dressing room.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Not really, what exactly were your expectations? We've played Test cricket like this for the last 4-5 years now, what's new :p
My expectations were that we'd not be 61/6 on a good batting track against an average bowling attack.
I know I'm asking a lot.....
 

smash84

The Tiger King
So you'd worry about chasing 80 or so against this ferocious NZ bowling attack would you I get the feeling you'd pick Pakistan to still lose in they needed 10 runs to win with 8 wickets in hand ;) This is NZ they're playing here
this is dire fdrom NZ 62/6

but this has happened before in SL. PAk needing 80 odd runs to win and have eight wickets in hand. They had come a long way. Then 8 wickets folded for 17 runs or so :wacko:
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Seriously, The Jacket looks like a very good find for Pakistan. Yet again.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
So so dire, the joys of being a New Zealand supporter.

Still don't understand the use of technology.
Especially considering the collapse started with a dodgy call that technology couldn't be used on.
 
Last edited:

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, didn't understand the use of technology to confirm the nick, but got to give credit to the fielder there for his presence of mind.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Nah, I remember something very similar last year at Lord's where Ponting was given out caught when he clearly hadn't hit it. They only checked the clean catch, not whether it was hit.

Greg Matthews the next day then read out the law which said pretty obviously that you have to check both if you can.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
this is dire fdrom NZ 62/6

but this has happened before in SL. PAk needing 80 odd runs to win and have eight wickets in hand. They had come a long way. Then 8 wickets folded for 17 runs or so :wacko:
Yeah, you're right, what was I thinking, NZ are well on top, in fact should think about a declaration soon :p
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Doull having a brain explosion in the commentary box.

Slapstick stuff really. I can't believe I booked 3 days of work leave in order to go watch these losers in Wellington.
 

99*

International Debutant
**** me.

How ****ing long is McIntosh going to get a free ride, the man is a specialist fielder with a 1/10 shot of making 30+. Get ****ing rid of him quicksmart and put Guptill up one. Ryder to three, I'm sick of this "oh he scored a 200 @ 5 keep him there" he's our best batsman by a mile and he can make the best use of his ability @ 3.

McCullum
Guptill
Ryder
Taylor
Williamson
Franklin (only because he's in the squad, there has to be somebody better)
Young
Vettori
Southee
Arnel
Martin
 

Howsie

International Captain
Exactly. If the umpire believes Williamson nicked it onto his pad why are the checking whether or not he did and not just the catch?
 

Top