You'd have to clean yourself up if he scored a quick 30 imo.I don't want him too tired to clean up the Saffer Innings in his first spell tbh.
Kallis is going to bat at #4. Excellent news.
Can he bat at 4 though,after being off the field the whole day?Kallis is going to bat at 4!
You'd have to clean yourself up if he scored a quick 30 imo.
Hilfenhaus, Bollinger and co. had enough to bounce out Raina on Indian tracks. How they couldn't do it to Sharma is ridiculous.Conditions do not suit his style of batting here. He's no better than Chris Martin on bouncy wickets. But he did play very well in SL and India, gets forward nicely against the spinners. His temperament is good for a tailender, technique not good enough in a place like this.
You'd have to clean yourself up if he scored a quick 30 imo.
He has to because of the match situation I suppose.Kallis is going to bat at 4!
True. We all moan about losing tosses but haven't made the most out of winning this one. Shows how good SA did to restrict our run-scoring rate to keep them level-pegging in this game, that too with only four bowlers.I think 400 would have been par given we have to bat last. We will be about 50 below that. Not bad but it will take a special performance from someone to win the game for India.
He played well and showed great application that day. It happens. Obviously had a bit of luck as well, like all tailenders who stick around. Bollinger wasn't there in the last session, remember.Hilfenhaus, Bollinger and co. had enough to bounce out Raina on Indian tracks. How they couldn't do it to Sharma is ridiculous.
Just bend your back.
If I was an Australian cricket fan watching these Sharma dismissals I'd be pretty damn annoyed.
I am not saying Sharama didn't bat well.He played well and showed great application that day. It happens. Obviously had a bit of luck as well, like all tailenders who stick around. Bollinger wasn't there in the last session, remember.
Prophetic.You'd have to clean yourself up if he scored a quick 30 imo.