Prince EWS
Global Moderator
You're even more ridiculous in your bias for/against certain players than me, TumTum. And I'm pretty ridiculous.
Don't know about thatYou're even more ridiculous in your bias for/against certain players than me, TumTum. And I'm pretty ridiculous.
They'd be a lot more effective if they weren't his stock ball.Holy **** these are some wonderful sliders by Haurtz.
Number of Slidermaster wickets for the matchNumber of Steve Smith wickets for the match
Currently: 8
You have to admit though that he's bowling better nowThey'd be a lot more effective if they weren't his stock ball.
Nathan Hauritz: right arm slide
EFA'dNumber of Slidermaster wickets for the match
Currently: 3
Better than what? Smith?You have to admit though that he's bowling better now
better than he was, say, not too long ago.Better than what? Smith?
Not exactly a glowing endorsement.
That's true, but again hardly a glowing endorsement.better than he was, say, not too long ago.
ie. he's improving
Now you know what its like watching Smith bowlThe last three pages made me want to stick pins in my eyes. Worst string of posts ever seen in the domestic thread.
Smith with 8 for the match now. FFS, wild slogs or not he is still the man taking the wickets.
Which means he bowled 203 non **** balls. So conceivably could take 203 wickets, right??Now you know what its like watching Smith bowl
BTW my Smith filth counter is only for today:
Currently: Half-trackers = 11 Full-tosses = 4
You could assume that he bowled 30 **** deliveries for the match, which could total to about 100 easy runs for the Poms.
No because his good balls are hardly threating because he bowls them so flat.Which means he bowled 203 non **** balls. So conceivably could take 203 wickets, right??
i'd say he's comfortably the best spinner in the country.That's true, but again hardly a glowing endorsement.