Last Man Standing: Ashes 2010/11

[Spark]

No
Yes

EDIT: Not a bad effort to win first dig

 

[Howe_zat]

No
Yes

(pessimism don't fail me now)

 

[morgieb]

Yes
Yes

 

[NUFAN]

No
No, cmon Siddle!

 

[andyc]

No
Yes

 

[TumTum]

yes
yes

 

[four_or_six]

Yes
No

Just to clarify - 'no' is what I should put for the second answer if I don't expect any wickets tomorrow?

 

[Adamc]

No
No

 

[marc71178]

Yes
Yes

 

[pasag]

Yes, Yes

 

[stephen]

No
Yes

 

[fredfertang]

Hoping to be out in Round 1

No
No

 

[Furball]

Assuming Q2 is Bollinger + Harris v Siddle + Doherty:

Yes
Yes

 

[BoyBrumby]

Just to clarify - 'no' is what I should put for the second answer if I don't expect any wickets tomorrow?

Lol. Reckon you've had a pint of waht Corrin's been on for years, but that's correct. If no wickets fall Harris and Bolly haven't taken more.

Assuming Q2 is Bollinger + Harris v Siddle + Doherty:

Nah, it's them v Siddle, Doherty, Watson, North and whomsoever turns his arm over.

 

[pskov]

Yes
Yes

 

[Furball]

Lol. Reckon you've had a pint of waht Corrin's been on for years, but that's correct. If no wickets fall Harris and Bolly haven't taken more.



Nah, it's them v Siddle, Doherty, Watson, North and whomsoever turns his arm over.

Meh, forgot about the batsmen. Still reckon DtR and Rhino will take more wickets anyway.

Any potential wickets from Katich, Ponting, Clarke and Hussey shouldn't count since they didn't make up the bowling attack at Brisbane

 

[Pothas]

No
Yes

 

[BoyBrumby]

I'm going No & No.

Think Harris might get Cook early doors but suspect Adelaide isn't Bollinger's kind of deck.

Sixteen signed up so far, get involved people! Could a nice mod please correct the title too?

 

[Neil Pickup]

No
Yes

 

[Magrat Garlick]

No
Yes