Blewett probably. Though I'd argue that Blewett was betterWho was the last bat as poor as North to get an extended run in Australia's test team? Matty Elliot?
At the fact that North's getting runs? Or the start of the game?
All the above I guess. Tired of this ****. Hoping for another epic partnership here between Haddin/Hussey.Think he meant Ponting's golden.
Definitely. Be interesting to see if Broad gets it to go, and is prepared to pitch it up enough to see it move.tiny bit of reverse going on here?
Nope; just like his face.Matt Prior's cap is filthy. Does he ever wash it?
New ball.Hard to see where the next wicket is going to come from, these 2 look pretty settled and the pitch looks pretty flat with most of the bowlers not really looking threatening.
From your keyboard to God's screen?Yeah, the fact that Australia have been horribly second best is kinda negated by having won the toss. You wouldn't expect the last five wickets to fall for less than 100 runs and if they get anywhere near 350 it's going to be a tough game for England to win.
Anything under 350 and they'd be comfortably favourites. India have won 3 Tests in the recent past batting 2nd and chasing 400+ 1st innings scores. Now England are probably a slightly weaker batting side than India but on this Adelaide strip, it they play upto their potential, they should get atleast 400. If the openers get them off to a good start, 500 isn't a far cry at all.Yeah, the fact that Australia have been horribly second best is kinda negated by having won the toss. You wouldn't expect the last five wickets to fall for less than 100 runs and if they get anywhere near 350 it's going to be a tough game for England to win.