Right, new hour means England's danger man is on. Here's Paul 'Curtley' Collingwood.
Reckon one of the big differences between India and the other sides is that actually they have a lot of batsmen capable of doing that.Reckon one of the big differences between India and most other sides is that they'd attempt to smash Colly out of the attack straight away and force the opposition to go back to tired bowlers
This didn't happen against us, even when we had only 3 bowlers in the first Test they didn't go after the part timers.Reckon one of the big differences between India and most other sides is that they'd attempt to smash Colly out of the attack straight away and force the opposition to go back to tired bowlers
And they're 2/200 rather than 5/217, so they can afford to.Reckon one of the big differences between India and the other sides is that actually they have a lot of batsmen capable of doing that.
Sometimes but mainly it's a different mindsetAnd they're 2/200 rather than 5/217, so they can afford to.
Oz shouldnt feel that they have any degree of control until they lead by 100Big hour coming up,new ball and Atherton says it is a bit gloomy so that may help the ball move a bit.If Australia get to the close 5 down they are in control but a few wickets and it is all up in the air again.
Ponting would have done it with a slightly different manner.If Ponting protested like Strauss had just done he'd get crucified on here. He's totally correct though.
Yeah, they changed the rules at one of the ICC meetings not long back.What so they didn't get offered the light?
The umpires just took it for them?