??Hmmm, reckon Hauritz has O'Keefe covered on both batting and fielding, tbh.
Was comparing O'Keefe to Doherty, but I agree with benchy. There's a reason O'Keefe bats ahead of Hauritz for NSW and averages 50 odd.Hmmm, reckon Hauritz has O'Keefe covered on both batting and fielding, tbh.
It's because he bats eight - he runs out of partners and ends up hitting out or finishing with red ink a lot.He's averaging 50 without a big score boosting that up too. If he can learn to convert his starts better he could be real handy.
O'keefe was bowling up the other end with Smith.Selectors must have ordered White to ignore O'Keefe and bowl Smith over and over.
TBH should have taken off George earlier. Anyway if the selectors have asked that then I'm all for it as it could mean getting rid of North or Hussey.Selectors must have ordered White to ignore O'Keefe and bowl Smith over and over.
Well, that would be good to watch tbh.Someone tell Ian Healy that it's not a 5 day game.
He's just come out with a peach, apparently if Australia A bat really well, they could leave England with a tricky day and a half. They'd have to score about 700 off 3 overs to achieve that.
Somewhere in between. I'd just play my natural game. It's a selection trial after all.Question for the Aus A bats: Do you try and attack in the hope of getting England in again to embarrass them a bit, or do you try and not lose your wicket and the game?
Thanks for your call Adamski.Question for the Aus A bats: Do you try and attack in the hope of getting England in again to embarrass them a bit, or do you try and not lose your wicket and the game?
Ferguson's meds ftw.Disgraceful how many overs Smith and George bowled. O'Keefe should have bowled well in excess of 30 and even a few from White or Khawaja would have been worth a punbt over those other blokes.