GotSpin
Hall of Fame Member
Well it's always better to watch cricket live if you have the timeSlip me a piece of paper under the table would ya
As long as the the commentators aren't useless
Well it's always better to watch cricket live if you have the timeSlip me a piece of paper under the table would ya
He'd be useful in seaming or bouncy conditions, not in the SC. Sarwan would really add strength to the batting, especially considering its inexperienceYet Sammy's test record is strangely impressive
rogerWell it's always better to watch cricket live if you have the time
As long as the the commentators aren't useless
^ Thoughts on above WW?If SL do manage to squeeze out these 60 odds runs & get bowled out for around 390 with around 40 overs in the day, it will be interesting how the Windies approach their 2nd innings batting. You'd think they'd want to attempt a quick 160-170 in around 35 overs making the overall lead 340ish & then have a quick lick at SL for 3-4 overs tonight? Too risky?
That's what i'm thinking to be honest, get Gayle and Barath to fire off quickly and push our score up to the high 300s, then things could get interesting.If SL do manage to squeeze out these 60 odds runs & get bowled out for around 390 with around 40 overs in the day, it will be interesting how the Windies approach their 2nd innings batting. You'd think they'd want to attempt a quick 160-170 in around 35 overs making the overall lead 340ish & then have a quick lick at SL for 3-4 overs tonight? Thoughts anyone? Too risky?
He took a million wickets on debut in England. Since then he hasn't bowled a lot whenever he's played because he looks so innocuous.Yet Sammy's test record is strangely impressive
I just don't get it. this field for shilly is perfect...then for the faster men hopelessIt has to be said though Sammy has completelu effed up the situation!!..he just hasn't got enough experience for these situations.