I'd expect you to get the guy's name right.What do you expect from a poor man's Murali Karthik?
There were some disturbances early on close to the sight-screen, but not 4 overs worth. The sooner they start adding runs to the batting teams extras for genuine slow bowling, the better.Awesomeness for NZ. India's over rated bowling attack being exposed. Long may it continue.
Who overrates them?Awesomeness for NZ. India's over rated bowling attack being exposed. Long may it continue.
1. Another person who doesn't know the meaning of overrated. No one rates the Indian bowling attack, so how is it overrated?Awesomeness for NZ. India's over rated bowling attack being exposed. Long may it continue.
1st Test: New Zealand v West Indies at Dunedin, Dec 11-15, 2008 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com@Athlai or someone with a scientific memory - when was the last time that Taylor was not required to bat in the first session of a new zealand inning.
Less than 70 runs?1. Another person who doesn't know the meaning of overrated. No one rates the Indian bowling attack, so how is it overrated?
2. How was it exposed? Less than 70 runs in the session with a dropped chance and a wicket off a no ball.
Was supposed to be an 8 tbhLess than 70 runs?
It was an excellent solution.Haha breaking the advertising sight screen was pretty awesome.
I think it's for the the shot looking at the batsman when you see the ad behind him.It was an excellent solution.
I don't know why they bother having ads on sight screens. Every match gets held up by them not being able to get rid of the ad. Why ****ing have ads there at all? Who looks at the sight screen at the other end during an over?