neville cardus
International Debutant
wtf?Sorry, but I really wish people wouldn't do this! Either use CAPS for all your acronyms\abbreviations or don't do it at all!
wtf?Sorry, but I really wish people wouldn't do this! Either use CAPS for all your acronyms\abbreviations or don't do it at all!
Hes ranked number 5 or 6 in the all time ICC Rankings for ODIs.If I misunderstood you and you were saying that David Gower was at one point ranked in the top 5-10 of all time then fair enough, I disagree with that just as you do.
Ah well if it's all time then that does seem strange indeed. Then again, some players just have amazing bursts of form that gives them single peak rating higher than their historical reputation would suggest.Hes rated number 5 or 6 in the all time ICC Rankings for ODIs.
I can only assume that, if it's true, then Gower achieved it very briefy around 1983 after a batch of outstanding innings in against Aus & NZ that winter. Beyond that, as you know, he was never keen on or very successful in the oneday game.WTF? Seriously? I've always said I give such ranking systems little credibility, but even the most absurd one I'd not imagine would come-up with that.
rRiaFP......iTLtTMyWwLIwLSorry, but I really wish people wouldn't do this! Either use CAPS for all your acronyms\abbreviations or don't do it at all!
Agree with you there. Feel that something like an average rating over a career would be a better indicator, but have never quite figured out how to turn a ratings graph like this one into an average rating.Ah well if it's all time then that does seem strange indeed. Then again, some players just have amazing bursts of form that gives them single peak rating higher than their historical reputation would suggest.
I enjoy the ICC ratings and the discussions they inspire, but I don't take them particularly seriously - to me, more relevant than those single "peak" ratings is a view of how their rating help up (or didn't) across a period of time.
Haha, your sense of humor is coming along nicely.Yeah, he was quite some player that James Adams at one point. Such a shame he never went on with things.
aside from 99.94No one number can be unequivocally stated to be a benchmark. The simple fact is that all overall career averages need to be analysed and taken in context.
Holy necroposting batman!aside from 99.94
Going with your analogies, Sobers didn't bat like Tendulkar.For those who have followed the game for the last 15 years or so,
Garry Sobers = Sachin Tendulkar's batting + Zaheer Khan's pace bowling + Daniel Vettori's spin bowling + Mark Waugh's catching + Mohammad Azharuddin's ground fielding + Shane Warne's captaincy
Don't know black magic or what, but magical indeed!
And, to reiterate what I've said many-a-times here: Garry Sobers wasn't the most rounded alrounder (Keith Miller was). But Sobers was the best player among all the alrounders, if you know what I mean.
exactlyNo, it could be argued he batted better than Tendulkar.