Teja.
Global Moderator
AWTAeng vs. Pak was such a poor series bar one match. **** batsman hanging their bat out and getting caught behind to pretty good fast bowling may be a nice novelty, but it wears out after the first match.
z
AWTAeng vs. Pak was such a poor series bar one match. **** batsman hanging their bat out and getting caught behind to pretty good fast bowling may be a nice novelty, but it wears out after the first match.
Before Sarfraz Nawaz famous spell of reverse-swing @ MCG 1979/80. In test history in tradition seamer friendly English & SA, NZ condtions. Or traditional bouncy AUS, WI, SA condtions. Reverse-swing hardly ever occured outside the sub-continent.The best pitches in the world to get early reverse swing too. Fast bowlers outside Asia have no ****ing idea about these pitches' advantages and suck at using them, thats all.
Making up stuff?. Ha.Sanz said:It would be nice to get some real statistics supporting such a hypothesis instead of simply making stuff up.
Your point being?Before Sarfraz Nawaz famous spell of reverse-swing @ MCG 1979/80. In test history in tradition seamer friendly English & SA, NZ condtions. Or traditional bouncy AUS, WI, SA condtions. Reverse-swing hardly ever occured outside the sub-continent.
Enough fast bowlers outside the sub-continent since 1980 have learnt to reverse-swing the ball when they went to the SC to bowl. But many more have not been able to learn this art as well.
In fact I believe you can, by shutting up.Making up stuff?. Ha.
Well if what i said in that post aren't known facts of test history. Then i really can't help you.
I'm not even sure myself. I just responed to question asked in the post. But now that i look back i'm not sure how posters Shri point is relevant to my response to this post:Your point being?
quote said:I don't Understand how pitches which are turning,have variable bounce can be considered as flat wickets?
The last i checked Spinners were also a part of the game. If the track does not suit pacers more than spinners it does not automatically become FLAT.
Australian pitches are the flattest around.I also don't understand how people make an assumption that only non-subcontinent pitches are pace friendly and If a player does not do well there he is automatically considered an average player.
Can anybody define what is really meant by being flat pitches? i thought flat pitches were meant to offer no assistance to the bowlers. If that is the case then how come Australian pitches are flat?Australian pitches are the flattest around.
Because Australian pitches don't offer a great deal of assistance to bowlers.Can anybody define what is really meant by being flat pitches? i thought flat pitches were meant to offer no assistance to the bowlers. If that is the case then how come Australian pitches are flat?
I really am looking forward to the SA tour.Laxman is the only Indian batsman I fear in SA.
Didn't realize that the hallmark of being a great batsman involves scoring bountiful runs against crap opposition and cashing in on flat tracks which seems like the general consensus on here. It certainly explains why Tendulkar is rated as highly on here as he is and why players like Laxman will perennially be underrated.
Give me a guy who stands up and wins games when his team needs him most over a guy who cashes in when the rest of his side could also have done the same.
No matter how flat the Aussie pitches can get, they will still have more bounce and pace for the quicks compared to SC pitches.Because Australian pitches don't offer a great deal of assistance to bowlers.
I was following the Australia Pakistan series earlier this year and I thought the Aussie pitches were quite sporting. Especially the Sydney pitch was nowhere near being flat. Even bowlers like Sami were finding a lot of movement off the pitch. And that is saying something.Because Australian pitches don't offer a great deal of assistance to bowlers.
I give you Pragyan Ojha.Didn't realize that the hallmark of being a great batsman involves scoring bountiful runs against crap opposition and cashing in on flat tracks which seems like the general consensus on here. It certainly explains why Tendulkar is rated as highly on here as he is and why players like Laxman will perennially be underrated.
Give me a guy who stands up and wins games when his team needs him most over a guy who cashes in when the rest of his side could also have done the same.
Although i 200% agree with the bolded & thats definately the consenus around here. I have never understood why you always put Tendulkar into this group sir TEC.Didn't realize that the hallmark of being a great batsman involves scoring bountiful runs against crap opposition and cashing in on flat tracks which seems like the general consensus on here. It certainly explains why Tendulkar is rated as highly on here as he is and why players like Laxman will perennially be underrated.
Give me a guy who stands up and wins games when his team needs him most over a guy who cashes in when the rest of his side could also have done the same.
But none of those results suit the poster.. Hence................It just makes them feel better.
There were two results in the two matches, two out of three matches had a result in Sri Lanka. When South Africa toured India there were two results out of two matches.
![]()