Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well that obviously was my point, as it was exactly what I said.I don't understand why you entered the debate in the first place? What was your point? That winning the toss isn't a guaranteed win?
Obviously that's the case, But you quote posts re: the toss which were being made with reference to DeusEx's post about 1-1 being a better reflection rather than 2-0.
If Australia lose 2-0 PLUS having won the toss PLUS having had the chance to bowl on day 5 and lose both tests (again, may not happen, but this is the hypothetical scenario), then it will be a fair reflection.
That is the point we are making. If you don't think 1-1 will be a better reflection that 2-0, why'd you enter the debtate?
Mate, you've built an entire construct around a one line response to Xuahib's point about winning the toss. Saying batting last = loss in Ondia is like me saying you should bowl first in Perth.
Look at the wickets. They have been excellent, both of them. Whichever team batted best could have secured a great advantage first innings, but they've each batted the same, roughly anyways. It's made for good cricket.
I won't ever say India don't deserve to win the series 2-0 if they do, conditions have been excellent but India have bowlers the bit better (Zaheer especially). It's been close, is all I'm saying. Been great cricket to watch from both teams.
Last edited: