Awesome anti-jinx thereAny other fast bowler would get wickets with the ball reversing like this...
But not ****ing Sreesanth.
touche,Wasn't even a question tbh
I like him because I think the prick factor makes his cricket a bit under-rated in some circles. That and the fact that he bowls fast outswingers with an awesome seam position but is a bit inconsistent - reminds me of early-days Anderson a lot.My post was indirectly pointed at Prince
hehI know Haddin had done a very good job 'n all, but given the way Paine has applied himself this series with the Bat and Gloves, Brad's going to have to be on top of his game from the moment he gets back.
He only scored 23 in the 2nd dig tbh, and just played potentially a match-losing shot.I know Haddin had done a very good job 'n all, but given the way Paine has applied himself this series with the Bat and Gloves, Brad's going to have to be on top of his game from the moment he gets back.
Awesome anti-jinx there
Was pretty important in support of Ponting thoughHe only scored 23 in the 2nd dig tbh, and just played potentially a match-losing shot.
Good series though, and Haddin under the pump, agreed.
Edit: Sorry I see you wrote that before he went out.
Yeah but Haddin's a ****, to be honest.He only scored 23 in the 2nd dig tbh, and just played potentially a match-losing shot.
Good series though, and Haddin under the pump, agreed.
Edit: Sorry I see you wrote that before he went out.
No way known you're not getting 180 runs with Sachin in the team.While this fall of wickets is increasing the chances of an Indian victory, it is also increasing chances of a defeat. If Australia had batted long enough and declared, they would have given themselves far less time to dismiss India. Don't know if this is good for India given we are 1-0 up.
Unless the tail can put on another 30 runs minimum, this should be a cakewalk for India.While this fall of wickets is increasing the chances of an Indian victory, it is also increasing chances of a defeat. If Australia had batted long enough and declared, they would have given themselves far less time to dismiss India. Don't know if this is good for India given we are 1-0 up.
thx for the confidence mateNo way known you're not getting 180 runs with Sachin in the team.
But we don't have Laxman and Ishant. Without them in the last game, you think we would've got to 180?No way known you're not getting 180 runs with Sachin in the team.
EDIT: And ****ing Sehwag as well...
Yeah, was saying that to a mate who was rating Paine and said he should replace Haddin.Yeah but Haddin's a ****, to be honest.