• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2010

NasserFan207

NasserFan207

International Vice-Captain
isaacnewton1 said:
Maybe. But they only get 3 or so years, and then they have had it. Hussey is the perfect example.
Click to expand...
But Hussey came into the team at the right time.

Basically, Australia will always have the best team available (theoretically). It does mean that players may end up with less outstanding records, but the team as a whole benefits.

I think Smith should be looking to replace Hauritz, and there isn't enough evidence to say he should yet.
 
I

isaacnewton1

Banned
Irish_Opener said:
But Hussey came into the team at the right time.

Basically, Australia will always have the best team available (theoretically). It does mean that players may end up with less outstanding records, but the team as a whole benefits.

I think Smith should be looking to replace Hauritz, and there isn't enough evidence to say he should yet.
Click to expand...
Yeh well unfortunately Australia doesn't have the best team available. Maybe if Aus management did exactly what you suggest it would work, but they don't (e.g. why is hussey, north still in the team etc.). So they might as well experiment even further by giving younger players some REAL experience.
 
GotSpin

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
isaacnewton1 said:
Yeh well unfortunately Australia doesn't have the best team available. Maybe if Aus management did exactly what you suggest it would work, but they don't (e.g. why is hussey, north still in the team etc.). So they might as well experiment even further by giving younger players some REAL experience.
Click to expand...
So they can fail and we look like Pakistan with our batting?
 
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
marc71178 said:
Hmmm, firstly I wonder why Zaheer was calling Laxman "Usain Bolt" when it was Raina that ran Ricky out.

Secondly, looking at the video of it, all the Indian team are stood in one group, and Harbhajan is about yard away from Zaheer.
Click to expand...
which is why Harby said I m telling u what Zak told me after the incident coz I was not there when it happened..



Really guys.. Harby may not be great but he is only as **** as Watson, Ponting, Clarke and the rest..
 
NasserFan207

NasserFan207

International Vice-Captain
isaacnewton1 said:
Yeh well unfortunately Australia doesn't have the best team available. Maybe if Aus management did exactly what you suggest it would work, but they don't (e.g. why is hussey, north still in the team etc.). So they might as well experiment even further by giving younger players some REAL experience.
Click to expand...
Agreed, thats why I said theoretically. Not sure whats going on tbh. Its not very 'australian' at all.
 
Cevno

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Was a very good low catch by Pujara off paine!!
Staying low made it look easier.

Btw,what is he doing in silly point as a sub?
 
GotSpin

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
isaacnewton1 said:
Two options. They fail, and we look like Pakistan with out batting (Whats new, have a look at this innings?). Or they succeed and we have future prospects for years to come.
Click to expand...
Batsmen should never be rushed into a team unless they're ready. While I agree there should be changes to our batting, Smith isn't the answer. There are other better batsmen available
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top