*Official* Australia in India 2010

[NasserFan207]

lol @ no UDRS

 

[Daemon]

North is literally jumping everytime he plays a ball

 

[Spark]

Gould is such a dodgy umpire.

Gave North not out the last Harbhajan over when it looked out ,and now has given a howler.
Also gave Katich not out earlier who was plumb.

Outside the line IMO.

 

[isaacnewton1]

This is where having Smith in the team would be really helpful...I have no idea why he isn't playing.

 

[Daemon]

This is where having Smith in the team would be really helpful...I have no idea why he isn't playing.

He was the top scorer in that Pakistan match too wasn't he?

 

[Xuhaib]

Gould was rubbish in Pak-Eng odi series,UDRS is a must unless you have Simon and Dar umpiring together.

 

[Jono]

This is where having Smith in the team would be really helpful...I have no idea why he isn't playing.

Who would you play him ahead of? Hilfenhaus?

 

[Spark]

He was the top scorer in that Pakistan match too wasn't he?

Equal top w/ Clarke with 77 IIRC in the 2nd dig. 1st dig was so small as to be insubstantial.

North into double figures!

Beautiful cut from Paine.

 

[NasserFan207]

This is where having Smith in the team would be really helpful...I have no idea why he isn't playing.

I think he'd take a beating bowling wise. Its probably a good idea not to play him against India untill he's got more experience.

 

[Cevno]

Outside the line IMO.

I think you are talking about the Appeal in the OJHA over WHICH bowden correctly gave not out.

The appeal in the Harbhajan over clearly struck in the line of stumps and Hawk eye showed it hitting the leg stump marginally like with the Tendulkar Dismissal yesterday.

 

[isaacnewton1]

He was the top scorer in that Pakistan match too wasn't he?

I can't remember if he was the top scorer, but it was a very handy 70 or so runs. He should be in instead Bollinger or Hilfenhaus, probably the latter.

 

[Jacknife]

Outside the line IMO.

Yes it was outside the line and the Katich one wasn't straight forward in real time.

 

[Spark]

I think you are talking about the Appeal in the OJHA over WHICH bowden correctly gave not out.

The appeal in the Harbhajan over clearly struck in the line of stumps and Hawk eye showed it hitting the leg stump marginally like with the Tendulkar Dismissal yesterday.

Nah looked much less out than yesterday's, as he wasn't on the walk.

Shot Timmy.

 

[Jono]

Yes it was outside the line and the Katich one wasn't straight forward in real time.

Disagree. This "was it bat first or pad first" stuff is fair enough when it hits both. But Katich's was flush on the pad and that is it.

 

[vcs]

I actually think Hilfenhaus bowled very well even if he didn't take any wickets. Dangerous bowler, his place in the side shouldn't be under threat IMO.

 

[kingpin]

Just came home,Did Sharma bowl that well??????

 

[Prince EWS]

Disagree. This "was it bat first or pad first" stuff is fair enough when it hits both. But Katich's was flush on the pad and that is it.

Yeah Katich was absolutely plumb.

 

[isaacnewton1]

I think he'd take a beating bowling wise. Its probably a good idea not to play him against India untill he's got more experience.

yeh but frankly all the bowlers except Johnson and Dougy took a pretty bad beating.

 

[Jacknife]

I think you are talking about the Appeal in the OJHA over WHICH bowden correctly gave not out.

The appeal in the Harbhajan over clearly struck in the line of stumps and Hawk eye showed it hitting the leg stump marginally like with the Tendulkar Dismissal yesterday.

It skimmed the leg stump,you can't say that was the one that should of been definitely out.

 

[NasserFan207]

Just came home,Did Sharma bowl that well??????

He got some inconsistent bounce, but it was mostly bad batting.