Spudsy2061
U19 Cricketer
Yeah yeah. So stocked for this. It's the UEFA Champs of cricket, what more could you want?
Agreed completely. Although if they removed the IPL teams, viewership in India will probably go down by a significant amount.I'll back one of Mumbai and Bangalore for this event, for the Indian players to figure.
I may be late on the discussion, but what's stopping Ross Taylor or Mike Hussey from playing for his chosen or home team? They can refuse the pay hikes, and the boards can support them. They won't go bankrupt if they oppose their IPL franchise, will they? It can put those greedy franchise owners- the real villains of the pack- in place. And what's stopping the governing body from restricting the maximum number of overseas players in a team to level things out? Or pushing aside the franchise owners to give the players a choice? The franchise owners need these internationals in those patched-up teams a lot more than the BCCI, surely.
Why can't they exclude the IPL from the Champions' League? It's anyway a platform for IPL contracts, not the ultimate event. They can make do with Indian state teams, and that won't hurt the league much. The IPL teams hardly did much in the last league, and were outperformed by the Aussies, Somerset, Trinidad and Cape Cobras, with only two internationals between those teams. A full-strength Mumbai or Karnataka or Delhi can be just as competitive as the top IPL teams and a lot more than Deccan Chargers.
Looking at each country's representation per team in this event, South Africa, Sri Lanka and West Indies field completely home-grown teams, making it eleven. New Zealand and Australia have at least nine or ten, with the gates open only this year in Australia. England have it high with nine, though they're not in the event, while Pakistan could easily field eleven. India, on the other hand, can just manage seven in a team. Doesn't that suggest something odd here? Yes, there's a third IPL team, but that's because the Pakistani team isn't in the mix, nor does any other country have an extra team.
Yet, these other teams do well with little to no overseas involvement, but IPL does not wish to learn. They've tried to set aside local players for the benefit of overseas signings, even those who are barely established. It didn't work in the Champions' League, but it still seems to go on, and the sooner something is done, the better.
This makes me want to root for Central Districts against Bangalore with Ross Taylor. Really.
Thanks for that, my internet is playing up and my drop down menus aren't working.Lol, my bad.
A level playing field with regards to invitations, scheduling and squad players?Yeah yeah. So stocked for this. It's the UEFA Champs of cricket, what more could you want?
Maybe not yet but it's still blomming young. I bet UEFA Champs league wasn't perfectly organized in its first few years.A level playing field with regards to invitations, scheduling and squad players?
Actually yes it was - it was set up properly with probably a better system than is currently in place.Maybe not yet but it's still blomming young. I bet UEFA Champs league wasn't perfectly organized in its first few years.
I still doubt this unless you can prove me wrong.Actually yes it was - it was set up properly with probably a better system than is currently in place.
No more overkill than 7 match OneDays and Ind-SL encounters every tuesday and thursday tbh.This is a nice competition in theory & all. But in the long term the both Champions League & the IPL cannot exist in a yearly cricket calendar. One has to go, since thats T20 overkill.
Well yea, the overall international calendar is broke. 7 match ODI series should have been abolished a longgg time ago - no ODI series should exceed 5 ODIs. While the IND & SL boards got to know why the have been playing each other so much in that past 2 years or so.No more overkill than 7 match OneDays and Ind-SL encounters every tuesday and thursday tbh.
Disagree somewhat since I think the 9 ODIs between England and Australia are necessary for both countries this year given that the WC follows immediately after the Ashes.Well yea, the overall international calendar is broke. 7 match ODI series should have been abolished a longgg time ago - no ODI series should exceed 5 ODIs.
But we cant have two T20 tournaments in on-year - madness. A T20 WC every 2 years along with either the IPL (preferably a revampled IPL) or the Champions League every, is enough T20 cricket.