The police haven't proved anything yet.I wonder how the police have managed to prove that the video was made before the no-balls were bowled?
Yea it's a fairly common expression, been used on Scrubs I think. The usual saying is think horses not zebras.well, I did make up the last part But it does go as "when you hear hoofs beat, think of horses", I think.. Seen it used a few times somewhere.. can't recall.
you are getting your panties in a twist, this is not clutching at straws, this is asking for due process - there is no reason for the PCB to automatically accept the video, ofcourse it looks bad and the majority of people have made their minds up, none the less the issue of due process and verification remains....Pretty easy one, that. If the video was made after the no-balls were bowled, why was the players' agent predicting when the no-balls were going to happen - ie talking about what was going to happen, in the future tense? Unless the players' agent was setting them up in a way that was going to get himself in a world of trouble, which seems pretty implausible to me.
There's some real clutching at straws going on here. Predictable, of course, but that's what it is: clutching at straws.
You do that behind closed doors. You don't ramble on it about it endlessly when confronted by the media, it's just utterly amateurish.you are getting your panties in a twist, this is not clutching at straws, this is asking for due process - there is no reason for the PCB to automatically accept the video, ofcourse it looks bad and the majority of people have made their minds up, none the less the issue of due process and verification remains....
Perhaps playing Devil's Advocate here but, Let's not get to conclusions now.It is just too unthinkable that they got this guy Majid to say all this AFTER events happened and set himself up to be prosecuted... As the saying goes, when you hear the hoofs beat, think of horses, not some avatar animals..
Why would they want to expose one of themselves again? It is one thing playing DA but quite another to clutch at non-existent straws.Perhaps playing Devil's Advocate here but, Let's not get to conclusions now.
The betting syndicate is very powerful and is easily capable of getting Majid to make the tape to get the players in trouble.
They could threaten him or pay him to make this video.
It's the players who have their career's to lose,not him. Don't think if nobody incurred a straight loss on this ,he can be charged with anything serious at all.
Let the police first establish the date of the video through forensics and other stuff before coming to conclusions either way.
Prima facie it may seem evidence but it is not the case many times once examined thoroughly.
It's going to be the best and easiest way for bookies, and it needs to be regarded as the same.But generally, you don't "fix" matches.
The betting that goes on in for player x to bowl two wides in his 4th over. They pay off said player to do so, and collect the huge odds for that happening. That way you only have to pay off one player, rather than a whole side in determining how a whole fixture pans out.
Why would they want to expose one of themselves again? It is one thing playing DA but quite another to clutch at non-existent straws.
Cometh the leader cometh the changeBloomin' heck, the ICC actually did something.